WM vs. ARQQ
WM (Waste Management, Inc.) and ARQQ (Arqit Quantum Inc.) are both stocks. WM operates in Waste Management (Industrials), while ARQQ operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 3 years, WM returned 12.33%/yr vs -28.53%/yr for ARQQ. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WM vs. ARQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WM achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than ARQQ's -37.84% return.
WM
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 2.63%
- 1Y
- -5.98%
- 3Y*
- 12.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
ARQQ
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- -37.84%
- 6M
- -52.03%
- 1Y
- -49.10%
- 3Y*
- -28.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WM vs. ARQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 0.71% | 10.50% | 14.28% | 16.20% | -4.49% | 7.79% |
ARQQ Arqit Quantum Inc. | -37.84% | -43.67% | 227.76% | -86.87% | -84.93% | 158.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between WM and ARQQ is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021 | 0.01 |
The correlation between WM and ARQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WM:
$88.75B
ARQQ:
$225.50M
WM:
$6.91
ARQQ:
-$4.72
WM:
3.49
ARQQ:
151.77
WM:
8.86
ARQQ:
7.91
WM:
$25.41B
ARQQ:
$1.43M
WM:
$5.61B
ARQQ:
-$307.00K
WM:
$6.96B
ARQQ:
-$68.30M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WM vs. ARQQ — Risk / Return Rank
WM
ARQQ
WM vs. ARQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) and Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WM | ARQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 0.98 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | -0.62 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | -0.91 | +0.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WM vs. ARQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WM drawdown since its inception was -77.85%, smaller than the maximum ARQQ drawdown of -99.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WM and ARQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WM | ARQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.85% | -99.60% | +21.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.70% | -79.78% | +63.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -89.76% | +71.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.24% | -98.57% | +88.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.69% | -88.78% | +71.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.58% | 53.78% | -46.20% |
Volatility
WM vs. ARQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Waste Management, Inc. (WM) is 6.13%, while Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) has a volatility of 35.65%. This indicates that WM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WM | ARQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 35.65% | -29.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.08% | 64.49% | -50.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.03% | 104.65% | -85.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.62% | 134.12% | -115.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 134.12% | -114.58% |
Dividends
WM vs. ARQQ - Dividend Comparison
WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while ARQQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARQQ Arqit Quantum Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WM Waste Management, Inc. | 1.61% | 1.50% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 1.38% | 1.85% | 1.80% | 2.09% | 1.97% | 2.31% | 2.89% |
Financials
WM vs. ARQQ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Waste Management, Inc. and Arqit Quantum Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
WM and ARQQ have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARQQ has higher volatility (35.65%) compared to WM (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WM dropped -77.85% vs ARQQ's -99.60%.
WM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WM and ARQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer