PortfoliosLab logo
ARQQ vs. CLS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ARQQ and CLS is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ARQQ vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ARQQ:

0.89

CLS:

1.54

Sortino Ratio

ARQQ:

2.53

CLS:

2.10

Omega Ratio

ARQQ:

1.30

CLS:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

ARQQ:

1.52

CLS:

2.35

Martin Ratio

ARQQ:

3.50

CLS:

5.81

Ulcer Index

ARQQ:

43.22%

CLS:

21.84%

Daily Std Dev

ARQQ:

172.25%

CLS:

75.69%

Max Drawdown

ARQQ:

-99.60%

CLS:

-96.93%

Current Drawdown

ARQQ:

-97.36%

CLS:

-16.84%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ARQQ:

$320.07M

CLS:

$13.74B

EPS

ARQQ:

-$5.99

CLS:

$3.58

PS Ratio

ARQQ:

935.88

CLS:

1.36

PB Ratio

ARQQ:

20.03

CLS:

8.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

ARQQ:

$342.00K

CLS:

$10.09B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ARQQ:

-$408.00K

CLS:

$1.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

ARQQ:

-$18.04M

CLS:

$724.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ARQQ achieves a -35.35% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 29.44% return.


ARQQ

YTD

-35.35%

1M

65.74%

6M

94.35%

1Y

151.10%

3Y*

-44.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CLS

YTD

29.44%

1M

34.16%

6M

34.00%

1Y

103.18%

3Y*

125.85%

5Y*

80.07%

10Y*

25.11%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Arqit Quantum Inc.

Celestica Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ARQQ vs. CLS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ARQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ARQQ is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ARQQ is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ARQQ is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ARQQ is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ARQQ is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ARQQ is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CLS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLS is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLS is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLS is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLS is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLS is 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ARQQ vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ARQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ARQQ and CLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ARQQ vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

Neither ARQQ nor CLS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ARQQ vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ARQQ drawdown since its inception was -99.60%, roughly equal to the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ARQQ and CLS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ARQQ vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

Arqit Quantum Inc. (ARQQ) has a higher volatility of 37.63% compared to Celestica Inc. (CLS) at 15.69%. This indicates that ARQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ARQQ vs. CLS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Arqit Quantum Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20212022202320242025
168.00K
2.65B
(ARQQ) Total Revenue
(CLS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items