WLIVX vs. FAOCX
WLIVX (WCM Focused International Value Fund) and FAOCX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, WLIVX returned 10.75%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for FAOCX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WLIVX charges 1.50%/yr vs 2.25%/yr for FAOCX.
Performance
WLIVX vs. FAOCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WLIVX
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 5.73%
- YTD
- 13.65%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 35.36%
- 3Y*
- 26.38%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- —
FAOCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -2.15%
- 3Y*
- 7.84%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
WLIVX vs. FAOCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLIVX WCM Focused International Value Fund | 13.65% | 40.75% | 12.13% | 18.08% | -26.40% | 17.41% | 31.80% |
FAOCX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C | 0.00% | 14.19% | 3.86% | 19.03% | -25.22% | 17.97% | 20.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLIVX and FAOCX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020 | 0.85 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WLIVX and FAOCX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.85, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLIVX vs. FAOCX — Risk / Return Rank
WLIVX
FAOCX
WLIVX vs. FAOCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WLIVX | FAOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.94 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | -0.42 | +3.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | -0.72 | +12.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WLIVX | FAOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | -0.34 | +2.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.17 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.25 | +0.64 |
Drawdowns
WLIVX vs. FAOCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLIVX drawdown since its inception was -37.86%, smaller than the maximum FAOCX drawdown of -60.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLIVX and FAOCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLIVX | FAOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.86% | -60.45% | +22.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -7.33% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.44% | -14.05% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.86% | -36.96% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.90% | +5.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.52% | -15.62% | +5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 4.01% | -0.98% |
Volatility
WLIVX vs. FAOCX - Volatility Comparison
WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) at 0.00%. This indicates that WLIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLIVX | FAOCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 0.00% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.59% | 4.07% | +10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 9.17% | +8.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.47% | 16.72% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 16.69% | +1.39% |
WLIVX vs. FAOCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLIVX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOCX's 2.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLIVX vs. FAOCX - Dividend Comparison
WLIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than FAOCX's 8.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOCX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C | 8.26% | 8.26% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.22% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 3.72% | 3.07% | 0.12% |
WLIVX WCM Focused International Value Fund | 1.94% | 2.20% | 1.31% | 0.65% | 0.32% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLIVX and FAOCX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WLIVX has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to FAOCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLIVX dropped -37.86% vs FAOCX's -60.45%.
WLIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLIVX and FAOCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer