PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAOCX vs. MPITX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAOCX vs. MPITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) and BNY Mellon International Fund (MPITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FAOCX has underperformed MPITX with an annualized return of 6.48%, while MPITX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.55% annualized return.


FAOCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-0.17%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
6.48%

MPITX

1D
0.73%
1M
2.28%
YTD
11.27%
6M
11.72%
1Y
25.04%
3Y*
14.89%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
8.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAOCX vs. MPITX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
0.00%14.19%3.86%19.03%-25.22%17.97%13.77%26.37%-15.77%28.58%
MPITX
BNY Mellon International Fund
11.27%31.06%1.61%17.01%-15.66%9.01%7.19%22.28%-16.66%27.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FAOCX and MPITX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2000

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between FAOCX and MPITX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAOCX vs. MPITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAOCX
FAOCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FAOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MPITX
MPITX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MPITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPITX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MPITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPITX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAOCX vs. MPITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) and BNY Mellon International Fund (MPITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAOCXMPITXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.30

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

2.14

-2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.21

6.89

-7.11

FAOCX vs. MPITX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAOCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the MPITX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAOCX and MPITX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAOCX vs. MPITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAOCX drawdown since its inception was -60.45%, roughly equal to the maximum MPITX drawdown of -58.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOCX and MPITX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAOCXMPITXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.45%

-58.61%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-11.35%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

-14.92%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.96%

-31.06%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-37.52%

+0.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.90%

-1.93%

-3.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.61%

-12.43%

-3.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

3.52%

+0.65%

Volatility

FAOCX vs. MPITX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) is 0.00%, while BNY Mellon International Fund (MPITX) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that FAOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAOCXMPITXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.96%

-4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.64%

12.70%

-9.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.76%

15.16%

-6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

15.84%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

16.97%

-0.33%

FAOCX vs. MPITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAOCX has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MPITX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAOCX vs. MPITX - Dividend Comparison

FAOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than MPITX's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
8.26%8.26%0.40%0.00%0.00%2.22%0.00%0.51%3.72%3.07%0.12%0.00%
MPITX
BNY Mellon International Fund
2.17%2.41%3.35%3.81%4.62%1.61%2.19%2.52%2.24%1.50%2.05%1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAOCX and MPITX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPITX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to FAOCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAOCX dropped -60.45% vs MPITX's -58.61%.

MPITX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAOCX and MPITX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer