WLIVX vs. WCMNX
WLIVX (WCM Focused International Value Fund) and WCMNX (WCM Small Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - WLIVX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by WCM Investment Management, while WCMNX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by WCM Investment Management. Over the past 5 years, WLIVX returned 10.44%/yr vs 1.57%/yr for WCMNX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WLIVX charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.24%/yr for WCMNX.
Performance
WLIVX vs. WCMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLIVX achieves a 12.72% return, which is significantly higher than WCMNX's 9.23% return.
WLIVX
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 6M
- 16.63%
- 1Y
- 34.70%
- 3Y*
- 26.03%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- —
WCMNX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 9.23%
- 6M
- 9.48%
- 1Y
- 26.64%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- —
WLIVX vs. WCMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLIVX WCM Focused International Value Fund | 12.72% | 40.75% | 12.13% | 18.08% | -26.40% | 17.41% | 31.80% |
WCMNX WCM Small Cap Growth Fund | 9.23% | 7.82% | 4.02% | 15.64% | -23.47% | 5.06% | 42.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between WLIVX and WCMNX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020 | 0.75 |
The correlation between WLIVX and WCMNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WLIVX vs. WCMNX — Risk / Return Rank
WLIVX
WCMNX
WLIVX vs. WCMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) and WCM Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WLIVX | WCMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.08 | 1.30 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | 1.95 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.23 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 1.53 | +1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.45 | 5.36 | +6.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WLIVX | WCMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.08 | 1.30 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.06 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.29 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
WLIVX vs. WCMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLIVX drawdown since its inception was -37.86%, smaller than the maximum WCMNX drawdown of -40.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLIVX and WCMNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WLIVX | WCMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.86% | -40.70% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.65% | -16.38% | +4.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.44% | -30.18% | +13.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.86% | -38.13% | +0.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.40% | +1.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -14.00% | +3.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 4.68% | -1.65% |
Volatility
WLIVX vs. WCMNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) is 5.54%, while WCM Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMNX) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that WLIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WLIVX | WCMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 6.16% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.62% | 15.67% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.62% | 21.21% | -3.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 24.74% | -6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.08% | 27.22% | -9.14% |
WLIVX vs. WCMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLIVX has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than WCMNX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
WLIVX vs. WCMNX - Dividend Comparison
WLIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than WCMNX's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCMNX WCM Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.90% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 9.16% | 1.07% |
WLIVX WCM Focused International Value Fund | 1.95% | 2.20% | 1.31% | 0.65% | 0.32% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WLIVX and WCMNX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WCMNX has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to WLIVX (5.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLIVX dropped -37.86% vs WCMNX's -40.70%.
WLIVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WLIVX and WCMNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer