WLIVX vs. WCQGX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) and WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX).

WLIVX is managed by WCM Investment Management. It was launched on Jun 28, 2020. WCQGX is managed by WCM Investment Management. It was launched on Mar 30, 2020.

Performance

WLIVX vs. WCQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) and WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WLIVX vs. WCQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WLIVX WCM Focused International Value Fund	-4.73%	40.75%	12.13%	18.08%	-26.40%	17.41%	31.80%
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund	-4.91%	20.97%	-3.03%	-18.49%	-26.70%	4.03%	32.97%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WLIVX having a -4.73% return and WCQGX slightly lower at -4.91%.

WLIVX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -10.26%
• YTD: -4.73%
• 6M: -3.16%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 19.83%
• 5Y*: 8.08%
• 10Y*: —

WCQGX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: -7.09%
• YTD: -4.91%
• 6M: -13.17%
• 1Y: 3.72%
• 3Y*: -3.66%
• 5Y*: -8.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLIVX vs. WCQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both WLIVX and WCQGX have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

WLIVX

WCM Focused International Value Fund

WCQGX

WCM China Quality Growth Fund

Return for Risk

WLIVX vs. WCQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLIVX

WLIVX Risk / Return Rank: 71
WLIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
WLIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
WLIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
WLIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
WLIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

WCQGX

WCQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8
WCQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
WCQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
WCQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8
WCQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
WCQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLIVX vs. WCQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) and WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WLIVX	WCQGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	0.16	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	0.36	+1.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.05	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	0.15	+1.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.81	0.39	+6.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WLIVX vs. WCQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLIVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the WCQGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLIVX and WCQGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WLIVX	WCQGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	0.16	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	-0.35	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.09	+0.64

Correlation

The correlation between WLIVX and WCQGX is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WLIVX vs. WCQGX - Dividend Comparison

WLIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than WCQGX's 7.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
WLIVX WCM Focused International Value Fund	2.31%	2.20%	1.31%	0.65%	0.32%	0.03%	0.00%
WCQGX WCM China Quality Growth Fund	7.01%	6.67%	2.02%	0.82%	0.28%	8.54%	2.38%

Drawdowns

WLIVX vs. WCQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLIVX drawdown since its inception was -37.86%, smaller than the maximum WCQGX drawdown of -59.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLIVX and WCQGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLIVX	WCQGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.86%	-59.28%	+21.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.24%	-15.17%	+1.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.86%	-57.82%	+19.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.65%	-45.21%	+33.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.77%	-34.12%	+23.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	6.60%	-3.21%

Volatility

WLIVX vs. WCQGX - Volatility Comparison

WCM Focused International Value Fund (WLIVX) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) at 6.98%. This indicates that WLIVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WLIVX	WCQGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.53%	6.98%	+0.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.01%	15.77%	-2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.46%	22.79%	-2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.15%	23.44%	-5.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	23.76%	-5.84%