PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAOCX vs. CIOVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAOCX vs. CIOVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) and Causeway International Opps Fd (CIOVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, FAOCX has underperformed CIOVX with an annualized return of 6.48%, while CIOVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.


FAOCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-1.01%
3Y*
6.99%
5Y*
2.79%
10Y*
6.48%

CIOVX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.28%
YTD
14.75%
6M
15.53%
1Y
34.85%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
12.67%
10Y*
11.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAOCX vs. CIOVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
0.00%14.19%3.86%19.03%-25.22%17.97%13.77%26.37%-15.77%28.58%
CIOVX
Causeway International Opps Fd
14.75%36.68%8.35%24.39%-11.28%6.38%5.21%21.40%-18.62%29.39%

Correlation

The correlation between FAOCX and CIOVX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between FAOCX and CIOVX has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAOCX vs. CIOVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAOCX
FAOCX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FAOCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAOCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAOCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FAOCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAOCX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CIOVX
CIOVX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CIOVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIOVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIOVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
CIOVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIOVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAOCX vs. CIOVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) and Causeway International Opps Fd (CIOVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAOCXCIOVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.40

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.13

2.41

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.21

8.66

-8.88

FAOCX vs. CIOVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAOCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the CIOVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAOCX and CIOVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAOCX vs. CIOVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAOCX drawdown since its inception was -60.45%, which is greater than CIOVX's maximum drawdown of -43.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOCX and CIOVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAOCXCIOVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.45%

-43.70%

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-14.92%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

-16.43%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.96%

-29.10%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-43.70%

+6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.90%

0.00%

-5.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.61%

-8.58%

-7.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

4.12%

+0.05%

Volatility

FAOCX vs. CIOVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) is 0.00%, while Causeway International Opps Fd (CIOVX) has a volatility of 6.96%. This indicates that FAOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIOVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAOCXCIOVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

6.96%

-6.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.64%

14.72%

-11.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.76%

16.99%

-8.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.71%

17.40%

-0.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

18.48%

-1.84%

FAOCX vs. CIOVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAOCX has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CIOVX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAOCX vs. CIOVX - Dividend Comparison

FAOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than CIOVX's 7.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIOVX
Causeway International Opps Fd
7.60%8.72%9.86%2.51%2.52%1.38%1.20%2.34%2.53%1.33%3.74%1.44%
FAOCX
Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C
8.26%8.26%0.40%0.00%0.00%2.22%0.00%0.51%3.72%3.07%0.12%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAOCX and CIOVX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIOVX has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to FAOCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAOCX dropped -60.45% vs CIOVX's -43.70%.

CIOVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAOCX and CIOVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer