PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WLDR vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WLDR vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 29.55% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.


WLDR

1D
-1.18%
1M
11.85%
YTD
29.55%
6M
34.62%
1Y
57.12%
3Y*
32.72%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*

USL

1D
1.55%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
63.07%
6M
59.66%
1Y
57.86%
3Y*
18.42%
5Y*
17.41%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDR vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
29.55%31.24%22.74%18.93%-10.44%26.77%-1.93%21.54%-20.28%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
63.07%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-18.63%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDR and USL is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2018

0.21

The correlation between WLDR and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WLDR vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WLDR
USL

Technology

29.9%

-

Financial Services

13.4%
4.5%

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.1%

-

Healthcare

9.1%

-

Industrials

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Energy

4.7%

-

Basic Materials

3.5%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Technology

WLDR
29.9%
USL

-

Financial Services

WLDR
13.4%
USL
4.5%

Communication Services

WLDR
10.9%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

WLDR
9.1%
USL

-

Healthcare

WLDR
9.1%
USL

-

Industrials

WLDR
8.6%
USL

-

Consumer Cyclical

WLDR
6.2%
USL

-

Energy

WLDR
4.7%
USL

-

Basic Materials

WLDR
3.5%
USL

-

Utilities

WLDR
2.7%
USL

-

Real Estate

WLDR
1.9%
USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WLDR vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDR
WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDR vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WLDRUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.34

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.48

3.47

+3.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.24

7.02

+19.22

WLDR vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WLDR Sharpe Ratio is 3.83, which is higher than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WLDR and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WLDRUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83

2.04

+1.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.06

0.58

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.01

+0.59

Drawdowns

WLDR vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WLDRUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.69%

-89.06%

+44.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.86%

-16.76%

+7.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.30%

-23.33%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.77%

-33.82%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-38.16%

+36.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.63%

-61.46%

+52.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

8.27%

-6.09%

Volatility

WLDR vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) is 5.63%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that WLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WLDRUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

10.53%

-4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

23.33%

-11.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

28.54%

-13.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

30.08%

-12.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.94%

32.35%

-11.41%

WLDR vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

WLDR vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
7.05%9.01%13.99%2.28%2.10%7.55%1.80%2.48%2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


WLDR and USL have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to WLDR (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WLDR dropped -44.69% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 5-year performance, WLDR leads with 18.09% vs 17.41% for USL. On fees, WLDR is cheaper at 0.67% per year. On volatility, WLDR has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 18.09% return vs 17.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WLDR is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.05%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

WLDR is categorized as Global Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. WLDR tracks Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for WLDR and 0.88% for USL.

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WLDR and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer