WLDR vs. FFLC
Compare and contrast key facts about Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC).
WLDR and FFLC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WLDR is a passively managed fund by Regents Park Funds that tracks the performance of the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. It was launched on Jan 17, 2018. FFLC is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 2, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WLDR or FFLC.
Correlation
The correlation between WLDR and FFLC is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WLDR vs. FFLC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WLDR:
1.71
FFLC:
1.73
WLDR:
2.42
FFLC:
2.36
WLDR:
1.31
FFLC:
1.31
WLDR:
2.96
FFLC:
2.63
WLDR:
8.75
FFLC:
11.02
WLDR:
2.82%
FFLC:
2.13%
WLDR:
14.43%
FFLC:
13.62%
WLDR:
-44.69%
FFLC:
-15.86%
WLDR:
-1.12%
FFLC:
-1.30%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly higher than FFLC's 4.03% return.
WLDR
6.56%
1.94%
11.77%
25.04%
11.74%
N/A
FFLC
4.03%
-0.00%
8.61%
24.42%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WLDR vs. FFLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FFLC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WLDR vs. FFLC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WLDR
FFLC
WLDR vs. FFLC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WLDR vs. FFLC - Dividend Comparison
WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.13%, more than FFLC's 0.79% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF | 13.13% | 14.00% | 2.28% | 2.09% | 7.56% | 1.80% | 2.48% | 2.83% |
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF | 0.79% | 0.82% | 0.57% | 1.67% | 1.68% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WLDR vs. FFLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than FFLC's maximum drawdown of -15.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and FFLC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WLDR vs. FFLC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) is 3.15%, while Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that WLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.