WLDR vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WLDR is a Global Equities fund tracking the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. WLDR is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WLDR charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

WLDR vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WLDR achieves a 27.97% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

WLDR

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -1.46%
• 6M: 23.30%
• YTD: 27.97%
• 1Y: 48.86%
• 3Y*: 29.21%
• 5Y*: 18.29%
• 10Y*: —

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WLDR vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	27.97%	4.19%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between WLDR and POW is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.70

Return for Risk

WLDR vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WLDR

WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 94
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 94

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WLDR vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WLDR	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.84	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.54	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.71	—	—

Drawdowns

WLDR vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WLDR drawdown since its inception was -44.69%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WLDR and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WLDR	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.69%	-18.37%	-26.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.71%	-18.37%	+14.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.55%	-4.33%	-4.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WLDR	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.01%	32.94%	-15.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.54%	32.94%	-15.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.03%	32.94%	-11.91%

WLDR vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WLDR has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

WLDR vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

WLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	7.27%	9.01%	13.99%	2.28%	2.10%	7.55%	1.80%	2.48%	2.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WLDR and POW in my portfolio?

WLDR and POW have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WLDR or POW?

On fees, WLDR is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WLDR or POW?

WLDR is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WLDR or POW?

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between WLDR and POW?

WLDR is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Regents Park Funds and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.67% for WLDR and 0.75% for POW.