WKC vs. CRDO
WKC (World Kinect Corporation) and CRDO (Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd) are both stocks. WKC operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy), while CRDO operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 3 years, WKC returned 24.13%/yr vs 130.87%/yr for CRDO. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WKC vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WKC achieves a 72.78% return, which is significantly higher than CRDO's 43.85% return.
WKC
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 20.02%
- 6M
- 50.43%
- YTD
- 72.78%
- 1Y
- 62.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 0.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.42%
CRDO
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -14.44%
- 6M
- 65.22%
- YTD
- 43.85%
- 1Y
- 92.44%
- 3Y*
- 130.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 87.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.17B | $1.40B | $1.87B | |
| $65.86M | $52.05M | $36.32M |
WKC vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WKC World Kinect Corporation | 72.78% | -12.32% | 23.82% | -14.60% | 1.71% |
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 43.85% | 114.09% | 245.20% | 46.28% | 10.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between WKC and CRDO is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.13 |
The correlation between WKC and CRDO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WKC:
$2.04B
CRDO:
$38.60B
WKC:
-$3.32
CRDO:
$2.50
WKC:
0.05
CRDO:
29.34
WKC:
1.64
CRDO:
19.33
WKC:
$41.79B
CRDO:
$1.34B
WKC:
$781.00M
CRDO:
$908.35M
WKC:
-$119.90M
CRDO:
$463.79M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WKC vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank
WKC
CRDO
WKC vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for World Kinect Corporation (WKC) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WKC | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.20 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 1.61 | +1.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 3.65 | +2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WKC vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WKC drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WKC and CRDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WKC | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.84% | -62.04% | -11.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.49% | -53.59% | +34.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.40% | -61.05% | +35.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.00% | -31.58% | +13.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.24% | -19.39% | -10.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.60% | 23.55% | -14.95% |
Volatility
WKC vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for World Kinect Corporation (WKC) is 8.11%, while Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) has a volatility of 29.83%. This indicates that WKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WKC | CRDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.11% | 29.83% | -21.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.69% | 73.09% | -52.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.48% | 92.00% | -62.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.07% | 82.43% | -47.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.45% | 82.43% | -39.98% |
Dividends
WKC vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison
WKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, while CRDO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRDO Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WKC World Kinect Corporation | 2.08% | 3.29% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 1.90% | 1.81% | 1.28% | 0.83% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 0.52% | 0.62% |
Financials
WKC vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between World Kinect Corporation and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WKC vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison
WKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported a gross profit of 365.10M and revenue of 13.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.7%.
CRDO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.
WKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported an operating income of 132.50M and revenue of 13.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
CRDO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.
WKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported a net income of 49.00M and revenue of 13.67B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
CRDO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WKC and CRDO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRDO has higher volatility (29.83%) compared to WKC (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WKC dropped -73.84% vs CRDO's -62.04%.
WKC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WKC and CRDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer