WKC vs. RMD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about World Kinect Corporation (WKC) and ResMed Inc. (RMD).

Performance

WKC vs. RMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in World Kinect Corporation (WKC) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WKC vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WKC World Kinect Corporation	-0.69%	-12.32%	23.82%	-14.60%	5.32%	-13.74%	-27.09%	104.82%	-23.15%	-38.26%
RMD ResMed Inc.	-6.59%	6.26%	34.18%	-16.55%	-19.47%	23.41%	38.33%	37.85%	36.38%	39.06%

Fundamentals

EPS WKC : -$11.02 RMD : $15.16
PS Ratio WKC : 0.03 RMD : 4.08
Total Revenue (TTM) WKC : $36.93B RMD : $5.40B
Gross Profit (TTM) WKC : $649.10M RMD : $3.29B
EBITDA (TTM) WKC : -$554.70M RMD : $1.96B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WKC achieves a -0.69% return, which is significantly higher than RMD's -6.59% return. Over the past 10 years, WKC has underperformed RMD with an annualized return of -5.56%, while RMD has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.

WKC

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -6.74%
• YTD: -0.69%
• 6M: -9.58%
• 1Y: -16.04%
• 3Y*: -0.50%
• 5Y*: -6.64%
• 10Y*: -5.56%

RMD

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -12.40%
• YTD: -6.59%
• 6M: -17.61%
• 1Y: 1.18%
• 3Y*: 1.78%
• 5Y*: 3.81%
• 10Y*: 15.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WKC vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WKC

WKC Risk / Return Rank: 17
WKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
WKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
WKC Omega Ratio Rank: 17
WKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
WKC Martin Ratio Rank: 17

RMD

RMD Risk / Return Rank: 41
RMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
RMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RMD Omega Ratio Rank: 36
RMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
RMD Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WKC vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for World Kinect Corporation (WKC) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WKC	RMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	0.05	-0.61
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.60	0.26	-0.86
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.03	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.71	0.12	-0.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	0.28	-1.54
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WKC vs. RMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WKC Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the RMD Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WKC and RMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WKC	RMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.56	0.05	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.19	0.12	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.13	0.50	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.53	-0.35

Correlation

The correlation between WKC and RMD is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WKC vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison

WKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than RMD's 1.04% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WKC World Kinect Corporation	3.47%	3.29%	2.47%	2.46%	1.90%	1.81%	1.28%	0.83%	1.12%	0.85%	0.52%	0.62%
RMD ResMed Inc.	1.04%	0.94%	0.88%	1.07%	0.83%	0.62%	0.73%	0.98%	1.26%	1.61%	2.03%	2.16%

Drawdowns

WKC vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WKC drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than RMD's maximum drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WKC and RMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WKC	RMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.84%	-61.61%	-12.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.53%	-24.74%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.95%	-53.99%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.72%	-53.99%	-6.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.87%	-23.22%	-29.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-30.17%	-15.91%	-14.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.76%	10.55%	+2.21%

Volatility

WKC vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for World Kinect Corporation (WKC) is 5.85%, while ResMed Inc. (RMD) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that WKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WKC	RMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	6.17%	-0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.95%	17.04%	+2.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.68%	25.62%	+3.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	35.84%	31.07%	+4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.35%	31.41%	+10.94%

Financials

WKC vs. RMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between World Kinect Corporation and ResMed Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WKC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported a gross profit of 235.40M and revenue of 9.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.6%.

RMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 878.72M and revenue of 1.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.8%.

WKC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported an operating income of -275.90M and revenue of 9.03B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.

RMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 491.66M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.6%.

WKC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported a net income of -279.70M and revenue of 9.03B, resulting in a net margin of -3.1%.

RMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 392.59M and revenue of 1.42B, resulting in a net margin of 27.6%.