PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WKC vs. RMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WKC vs. RMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in World Kinect Corporation (WKC) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WKC achieves a 24.02% return, which is significantly higher than RMD's -23.70% return. Over the past 10 years, WKC has underperformed RMD with an annualized return of -2.91%, while RMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.


WKC

1D
-1.54%
1M
6.31%
YTD
24.02%
6M
25.00%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
8.63%
5Y*
-0.39%
10Y*
-2.91%

RMD

1D
-1.94%
1M
-10.56%
YTD
-23.70%
6M
-26.73%
1Y
-24.35%
3Y*
-5.15%
5Y*
-1.30%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WKC vs. RMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WKC
World Kinect Corporation
24.02%-12.32%23.82%-14.60%5.32%-13.74%-27.09%104.82%-23.15%-38.26%
RMD
ResMed Inc.
-23.70%6.26%34.18%-16.55%-19.47%23.41%38.33%37.85%36.38%39.06%

Correlation

The correlation between WKC and RMD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 1995

0.20

Fundamentals

EPS

WKC:

-$10.34

RMD:

$13.78

PS Ratio

WKC:

0.04

RMD:

3.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

WKC:

$37.18B

RMD:

$5.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WKC:

$687.60M

RMD:

$3.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

WKC:

-$499.70M

RMD:

$2.10B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WKC vs. RMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WKC
WKC Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
WKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
WKC Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
WKC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

RMD
RMD Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
RMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
RMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WKC vs. RMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for World Kinect Corporation (WKC) and ResMed Inc. (RMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WKCRMDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.29

-1.04

+1.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.61

-1.37

+1.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.83

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

-0.66

+1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.66

-1.60

+2.26

WKC vs. RMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WKC Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is higher than the RMD Sharpe Ratio of -1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WKC and RMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WKCRMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

-1.04

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.04

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

0.42

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.51

-0.31

Drawdowns

WKC vs. RMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WKC drawdown since its inception was -73.84%, which is greater than RMD's maximum drawdown of -61.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WKC and RMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WKCRMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.84%

-61.61%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.53%

-37.28%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-40.09%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.43%

-53.99%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.80%

-53.99%

-4.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.14%

-37.28%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.25%

-15.97%

-14.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.98%

15.37%

-2.39%

Volatility

WKC vs. RMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for World Kinect Corporation (WKC) is 7.07%, while ResMed Inc. (RMD) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that WKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WKCRMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

9.37%

-2.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.55%

19.04%

+2.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.19%

23.47%

+4.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.46%

31.04%

+4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.47%

31.51%

+10.96%

Dividends

WKC vs. RMD - Dividend Comparison

WKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than RMD's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMD
ResMed Inc.
1.31%0.94%0.88%1.07%0.83%0.62%0.73%0.98%1.26%1.61%2.03%2.16%
WKC
World Kinect Corporation
2.78%3.29%2.47%2.46%1.90%1.81%1.28%0.83%1.12%0.85%0.52%0.62%

Financials

WKC vs. RMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between World Kinect Corporation and ResMed Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
9.69B
1.43B
(WKC) Total Revenue
(RMD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WKC vs. RMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between World Kinect Corporation and ResMed Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
2.8%
62.3%
Portfolio components
WKC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported a gross profit of 271.20M and revenue of 9.69B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.8%.

RMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.

WKC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported an operating income of 56.30M and revenue of 9.69B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.6%.

RMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

WKC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported a net income of 26.20M and revenue of 9.69B, resulting in a net margin of 0.3%.

RMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WKC and RMD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RMD has higher volatility (9.37%) compared to WKC (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WKC dropped -73.84% vs RMD's -61.61%.

WKC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs -1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WKC and RMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer