WISGX vs. RFIMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX).
WISGX is managed by Segall Bryant & Hamill. It was launched on Dec 20, 2013. RFIMX is managed by Ranger Funds. It was launched on Jun 6, 2018.
Performance
WISGX vs. RFIMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WISGX vs. RFIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 1.94% | 6.85% | 15.75% | 18.32% | -32.48% | 11.79% | 57.84% | 28.67% | -1.24% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 0.96% | 1.99% | 11.52% | 9.14% | -24.26% | 30.58% | 44.44% | 24.94% | -0.56% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WISGX achieves a 1.94% return, which is significantly higher than RFIMX's 0.96% return.
WISGX
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 22.43%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 1.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
RFIMX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 15.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WISGX vs. RFIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WISGX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than RFIMX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WISGX vs. RFIMX — Risk / Return Rank
WISGX
RFIMX
WISGX vs. RFIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) and Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WISGX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.71 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.44 | 1.15 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.14 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.52 | 1.05 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 3.64 | +2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WISGX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.71 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.00 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.00 | +0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between WISGX and RFIMX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WISGX vs. RFIMX - Dividend Comparison
WISGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RFIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WISGX Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 29.83% | 7.74% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund | 1.31% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 47.82% | 71.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
WISGX vs. RFIMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WISGX drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum RFIMX drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WISGX and RFIMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WISGX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -99.41% | +56.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.26% | -11.77% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.22% | -99.41% | +56.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.74% | -99.24% | +90.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.69% | -27.70% | +15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 3.41% | +0.28% |
Volatility
WISGX vs. RFIMX - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Small Cap Growth Fund (WISGX) has a higher volatility of 9.23% compared to Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) at 6.22%. This indicates that WISGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RFIMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WISGX | RFIMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 6.22% | +3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.49% | 13.61% | +1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.34% | 22.27% | +2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.44% | 8,947.93% | -8,923.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.93% | 7,425.82% | -7,401.89% |