RFIMX vs. ONEQ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RFIMX (Ranger Micro Cap Fund) and ONEQ (Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF) are both funds - RFIMX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Ranger Funds, while ONEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite Index. Over the past 5 years, RFIMX returned 4.20%/yr vs 14.06%/yr for ONEQ. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RFIMX charges 1.51%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for ONEQ.

Performance

RFIMX vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RFIMX achieves a 20.93% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ's 13.30% return.

RFIMX

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 6.63%
• YTD: 20.93%
• 6M: 16.74%
• 1Y: 31.87%
• 3Y*: 8.52%
• 5Y*: 4.20%
• 10Y*: —

ONEQ

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 13.30%
• 6M: 12.39%
• 1Y: 35.91%
• 3Y*: 25.75%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 19.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RFIMX vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund	20.93%	1.99%	11.52%	9.14%	-24.26%	30.58%	44.44%	24.94%	-0.56%
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	13.30%	20.89%	29.30%	45.73%	-32.12%	22.11%	44.87%	38.01%	-1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between RFIMX and ONEQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2018	0.72

The correlation between RFIMX and ONEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RFIMX vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RFIMX

RFIMX Risk / Return Rank: 47
RFIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
RFIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RFIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 31
RFIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
RFIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

ONEQ

ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 62
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RFIMX vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RFIMX	ONEQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	2.09	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.75	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.36	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	2.86	+0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.75	10.89	-1.14

RFIMX vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RFIMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the ONEQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RFIMX and ONEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RFIMX vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RFIMX drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than ONEQ's maximum drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RFIMX and ONEQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	RFIMX	ONEQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.41%	-55.09%	-44.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-12.64%	+3.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.41%	-24.09%	-75.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.41%	-35.23%	-64.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.09%	-3.29%	-95.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-7.94%	-21.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.31%	-0.09%

Volatility

RFIMX vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ranger Micro Cap Fund (RFIMX) is 6.24%, while Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that RFIMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RFIMX	ONEQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.24%	7.25%	-1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.24%	13.53%	+0.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.47%	17.28%	+2.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5,376.38%	22.33%	+5,354.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4,390.97%	21.81%	+4,369.16%

RFIMX vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

RFIMX has a 1.51% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.

Dividends

RFIMX vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

RFIMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than ONEQ's 0.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF	0.71%	0.54%	0.65%	0.71%	0.97%	0.54%	0.71%	2.51%	1.08%	0.84%	1.12%	1.04%
RFIMX Ranger Micro Cap Fund	1.10%	1.33%	0.00%	0.77%	47.82%	71.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RFIMX and ONEQ in my portfolio?

RFIMX and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RFIMX or ONEQ?

ONEQ has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to RFIMX (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RFIMX dropped -99.41% vs ONEQ's -55.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.