WINN vs. VV
WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) and VV (Vanguard Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WINN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while VV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Index. WINN is actively managed, while VV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WINN returned 23.40%/yr vs 22.94%/yr for VV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WINN charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VV.
Performance
WINN vs. VV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than VV's 11.16% return.
WINN
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 7.28%
- 6M
- 5.80%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- 23.40%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VV
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.83%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 28.29%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 13.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.57%
WINN vs. VV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF | 7.28% | 14.31% | 31.64% | 52.44% | -26.67% |
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 11.16% | 18.11% | 25.25% | 27.18% | -13.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between WINN and VV is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2022 | 0.93 |
The correlation between WINN and VV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
WINN vs. VV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WINN
VV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
WINN
VV
Communication Services
WINN
VV
Consumer Cyclical
WINN
VV
Healthcare
WINN
VV
Financial Services
WINN
VV
Industrials
WINN
VV
Consumer Defensive
WINN
VV
Utilities
WINN
VV
Real Estate
WINN
VV
Basic Materials
WINN
-
VV
Energy
WINN
-
VV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WINN vs. VV — Risk / Return Rank
WINN
VV
WINN vs. VV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WINN | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.43 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 3.09 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.40 | 14.11 | -10.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WINN | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 2.37 | -1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.60 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
WINN vs. VV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, smaller than the maximum VV drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and VV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WINN | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.07% | -54.81% | +22.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.06% | -9.21% | -8.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.66% | -18.97% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.88% | -0.30% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -6.84% | -2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.78% | 2.01% | +3.77% |
Volatility
WINN vs. VV - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Vanguard Large-Cap ETF (VV) at 2.79%. This indicates that WINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WINN | VV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 2.79% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 8.99% | +3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 11.99% | +4.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 17.22% | +6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 18.19% | +5.54% |
WINN vs. VV - Expense Ratio Comparison
WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than VV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
WINN vs. VV - Dividend Comparison
WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VV Vanguard Large-Cap ETF | 0.97% | 1.08% | 1.24% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.19% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.09% | 1.75% | 1.98% | 1.96% |
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, WINN and VV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
WINN has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to VV (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINN dropped -32.07% vs VV's -54.81%.
On 3-year performance, WINN leads with 23.40% vs 22.94% for VV. On fees, VV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VV has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, WINN has performed better with a 23.40% return vs 22.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for WINN.
VV has the higher dividend yield at 0.97%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.
WINN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for WINN and 0.04% for VV.
VV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WINN and VV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer