WINN vs. QWLD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) and QWLD (SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. WINN is actively managed, while QWLD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WINN returned 19.38%/yr vs 15.49%/yr for QWLD. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WINN charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QWLD.

Performance

WINN vs. QWLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than QWLD's 9.39% return.

WINN

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: -0.22%
• 6M: 5.99%
• YTD: 4.13%
• 1Y: 10.70%
• 3Y*: 19.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.85%

QWLD

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 6.46%
• YTD: 9.39%
• 1Y: 19.11%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: 10.03%
• 10Y*: 11.57%
• ALL TIME*: 10.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	$231.12K	$297.84K	$1.04M
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	$2.47M	$3.46M	$3.57M

WINN vs. QWLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	4.13%	14.31%	31.64%	52.44%	-27.98%
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	9.39%	17.93%	14.44%	19.59%	-10.81%

Correlation

The correlation between WINN and QWLD is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2022	0.78

The correlation between WINN and QWLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WINN vs. QWLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WINN	QWLD
Technology	48.8%	24.9%
Communication Services	13.0%	9.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	6.3%
Healthcare	9.3%	13.2%
Industrials	7.5%	10.9%
Financial Services	4.7%	16.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	8.1%
Utilities	1.2%	3.8%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.0%
Basic Materials	-	2.5%
Energy	-	3.4%

Return for Risk

WINN vs. QWLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 21
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 20

QWLD

QWLD Risk / Return Rank: 80
QWLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QWLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
QWLD Omega Ratio Rank: 82
QWLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QWLD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WINN vs. QWLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WINN	QWLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	1.93	-1.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	2.75	-1.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.34	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.47	2.44	-1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.38	10.67	-9.30

WINN vs. QWLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WINN Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the QWLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINN and QWLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WINN vs. QWLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, roughly equal to the maximum QWLD drawdown of -31.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and QWLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WINN	QWLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.07%	-31.89%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-7.66%	-10.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	-12.40%	-11.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.84%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.76%	0.00%	-4.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.93%	-3.66%	-5.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.13%	1.75%	+4.38%

Volatility

WINN vs. QWLD - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF (QWLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that WINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QWLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WINN	QWLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	2.30%	+2.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.79%	7.73%	+6.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.56%	9.71%	+7.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.64%	13.51%	+10.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.64%	15.12%	+8.52%

WINN vs. QWLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than QWLD's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

WINN vs. QWLD - Dividend Comparison

WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QWLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QWLD SPDR MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF	1.79%	1.85%	1.74%	1.78%	2.02%	1.77%	1.77%	2.13%	2.33%	2.73%	2.22%	3.42%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WINN and QWLD in my portfolio?

WINN and QWLD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WINN or QWLD?

WINN has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to QWLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINN dropped -32.07% vs QWLD's -31.89%.

Which ETF is better, WINN or QWLD?

On 3-year performance, WINN leads with 19.38% vs 15.49% for QWLD. On fees, QWLD is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, QWLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WINN or QWLD?

Over the 3-year period, WINN has performed better with a 19.38% return vs 15.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WINN or QWLD?

QWLD is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for WINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WINN or QWLD?

QWLD has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.

What is the main difference between WINN and QWLD?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for WINN and 0.30% for QWLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QWLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.