WINN vs. MAPP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) and MAPP (Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WINN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while MAPP is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Harbor. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WINN returned 20.20% vs 21.23% for MAPP. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WINN charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for MAPP.

Performance

WINN vs. MAPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with WINN having a 7.32% return and MAPP slightly lower at 7.25%.

WINN

• 1D: -1.18%
• 1M: 5.43%
• YTD: 7.32%
• 6M: 5.90%
• 1Y: 20.20%
• 3Y*: 23.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAPP

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 2.82%
• YTD: 7.25%
• 6M: 8.20%
• 1Y: 21.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WINN vs. MAPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	7.32%	14.31%	31.64%	9.43%
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	7.25%	18.67%	14.25%	3.86%

Correlation

The correlation between WINN and MAPP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.78

The correlation between WINN and MAPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

WINN vs. MAPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WINN	MAPP
Technology	49.2%	36.9%
Communication Services	15.9%	12.2%
Consumer Cyclical	13.3%	8.3%
Healthcare	6.8%	5.4%
Financial Services	5.1%	15.0%
Industrials	4.9%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	5.4%
Utilities	1.4%	1.8%
Real Estate	0.4%	1.6%
Basic Materials	-	2.9%
Energy	-	2.3%

Return for Risk

WINN vs. MAPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 31
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 26

MAPP

MAPP Risk / Return Rank: 73
MAPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
MAPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
MAPP Omega Ratio Rank: 73
MAPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MAPP Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WINN vs. MAPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WINN	MAPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.39	-1.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	3.37	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.43	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	3.45	-2.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.51	13.70	-10.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WINN vs. MAPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WINN Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the MAPP Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINN and MAPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WINN	MAPP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	2.39	-1.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	1.53	-0.91

Drawdowns

WINN vs. MAPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, which is greater than MAPP's maximum drawdown of -12.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and MAPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	WINN	MAPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.07%	-12.92%	-19.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-6.17%	-11.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	-0.65%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.09%	-1.38%	-7.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.78%	1.55%	+4.23%

Volatility

WINN vs. MAPP - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF (MAPP) at 2.98%. This indicates that WINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WINN	MAPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	2.98%	+1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.24%	7.07%	+5.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.12%	8.94%	+7.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.74%	10.75%	+12.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.74%	10.75%	+12.99%

WINN vs. MAPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than MAPP's 0.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

WINN vs. MAPP - Dividend Comparison

WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MAPP Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF	2.76%	2.96%	2.41%	2.78%	0.00%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WINN and MAPP in my portfolio?

WINN and MAPP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WINN or MAPP?

WINN has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to MAPP (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WINN dropped -32.07% vs MAPP's -12.92%.

Which ETF is better, WINN or MAPP?

On 1-year performance, MAPP leads with 21.23% vs 20.20% for WINN. On fees, WINN is cheaper at 0.57% per year. On volatility, MAPP has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WINN or MAPP?

Over the 1-year period, MAPP has performed better with a 21.23% return vs 20.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WINN or MAPP?

WINN is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.92% for MAPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WINN or MAPP?

MAPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.

What is the main difference between WINN and MAPP?

WINN is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MAPP is Global Allocation. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for WINN and 0.92% for MAPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MAPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.