WINN vs. HAPI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI).

WINN and HAPI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WINN is an actively managed fund by Harbor. It was launched on Feb 2, 2022. HAPI is a passively managed fund by Harbor that tracks the performance of the CIBC Human Capital Index. It was launched on Oct 12, 2022.

Performance

WINN vs. HAPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WINN vs. HAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	-10.86%	14.31%	31.64%	52.44%	-1.99%
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	-3.35%	16.26%	27.62%	30.29%	6.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a -10.86% return, which is significantly lower than HAPI's -3.35% return.

WINN

• 1D: 3.62%
• 1M: -5.33%
• YTD: -10.86%
• 6M: -11.01%
• 1Y: 13.18%
• 3Y*: 19.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HAPI

• 1D: 2.69%
• 1M: -4.81%
• YTD: -3.35%
• 6M: -0.63%
• 1Y: 17.37%
• 3Y*: 19.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WINN vs. HAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than HAPI's 0.35% expense ratio.

WINN

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF

HAPI

Harbor Corporate Culture ETF

Return for Risk

WINN vs. HAPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 32
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 35
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 29

HAPI

HAPI Risk / Return Rank: 61
HAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
HAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
HAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 62
HAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
HAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WINN vs. HAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WINN	HAPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	0.97	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	1.49	-0.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.22	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.74	1.48	-0.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.42	7.15	-4.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WINN vs. HAPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WINN Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the HAPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINN and HAPI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WINN	HAPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58	0.97	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	1.39	-0.97

Correlation

The correlation between WINN and HAPI is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

WINN vs. HAPI - Dividend Comparison

WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	0.90%	0.87%	0.21%	1.21%	0.29%

Drawdowns

WINN vs. HAPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, which is greater than HAPI's maximum drawdown of -19.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and HAPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	WINN	HAPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.07%	-19.46%	-12.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.06%	-12.18%	-5.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.10%	-5.66%	-9.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.30%	-2.08%	-7.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.51%	2.52%	+2.99%

Volatility

WINN vs. HAPI - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) at 4.82%. This indicates that WINN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WINN	HAPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.84%	4.82%	+2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.89%	9.12%	+3.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.84%	17.98%	+4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.01%	15.80%	+8.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.01%	15.80%	+8.21%