PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WINN vs. GARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WINN vs. GARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WINN vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WINN
Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
-10.86%14.31%31.64%52.44%-26.67%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
-6.01%21.49%37.42%42.86%-18.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WINN achieves a -10.86% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's -6.01% return.


WINN

1D
3.62%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
-10.86%
6M
-11.01%
1Y
13.18%
3Y*
19.84%
5Y*
10Y*

GARP

1D
3.86%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
-6.01%
6M
-2.39%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
15.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WINN vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

WINN has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WINN vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WINN
WINN Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WINN vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WINNGARPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.58

1.06

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

1.62

-0.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.23

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.87

-1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.42

6.91

-4.50

WINN vs. GARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WINN Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is lower than the GARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WINN and GARP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WINNGARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

1.06

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.71

-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between WINN and GARP is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

WINN vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison

WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
WINN
Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.06%0.00%0.00%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.32%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%

Drawdowns

WINN vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WINN drawdown since its inception was -32.07%, roughly equal to the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WINN and GARP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WINNGARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.07%

-31.34%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.06%

-13.69%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.10%

-10.35%

-4.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-7.53%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.51%

3.71%

+1.80%

Volatility

WINN vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) is 6.84%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that WINN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WINNGARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

7.52%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

14.44%

-1.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.84%

24.39%

-1.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.01%

21.86%

+2.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.01%

24.02%

-0.01%