PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WIMA vs. GDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WIMA vs. GDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WIMA

1D
-0.77%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDT

1D
-0.85%
1M
-1.71%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIMA vs. GDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WIMA and GDT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WIMA vs. GDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WIMA vs. GDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WIMAGDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.12

-0.63

+0.50

Drawdowns

WIMA vs. GDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIMA drawdown since its inception was -2.75%, smaller than the maximum GDT drawdown of -18.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMA and GDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WIMAGDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-18.06%

+15.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-16.07%

+15.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-9.90%

+8.95%

Volatility

WIMA vs. GDT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WIMAGDTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.54%

33.36%

-19.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

33.36%

-19.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.54%

33.36%

-19.82%

WIMA vs. GDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIMA has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GDT's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

WIMA vs. GDT - Dividend Comparison

WIMA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WIMA and GDT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for WIMA.

GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for WIMA.

Their fees differ too: 0.42% for WIMA and 0.30% for GDT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WIMA and GDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer