WIMA vs. MATE

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) and MATE (Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. WIMA is passively managed, while MATE is actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WIMA charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for MATE.

Performance

WIMA vs. MATE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

WIMA

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MATE

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 7.30%
• YTD: 20.86%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIMA vs. MATE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund	0.65%
MATE Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF	5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between WIMA and MATE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026	0.33

Return for Risk

WIMA vs. MATE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA) and Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF (MATE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WIMA	MATE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	3.10	-2.38

Drawdowns

WIMA vs. MATE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIMA drawdown since its inception was -2.75%, smaller than the maximum MATE drawdown of -13.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIMA and MATE.

Drawdown Indicators

	WIMA	MATE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-13.24%	+10.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-3.30%	+2.33%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WIMA	MATE	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	21.85%	-8.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.60%	21.85%	-8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.60%	21.85%	-8.25%

WIMA vs. MATE - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIMA has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than MATE's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

WIMA vs. MATE - Dividend Comparison

Neither WIMA nor MATE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WIMA and MATE in my portfolio?

WIMA and MATE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WIMA or MATE?

On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WIMA or MATE?

WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for MATE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WIMA or MATE?

WIMA and MATE have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between WIMA and MATE?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Man Group. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for WIMA and 0.97% for MATE.