WILC vs. CI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WILC (G. Willi-Food International Ltd.) and CI (Cigna Corporation) are both stocks. WILC operates in Food Distribution (Consumer Defensive), while CI operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, WILC returned 26.04%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for CI. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

WILC vs. CI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) and Cigna Corporation (CI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WILC achieves a 19.39% return, which is significantly higher than CI's -1.09% return. Over the past 10 years, WILC has outperformed CI with an annualized return of 26.04%, while CI has yielded a comparatively lower 8.67% annualized return.

WILC

• 1D: -3.57%
• 1M: 5.47%
• YTD: 19.39%
• 6M: 32.31%
• 1Y: 120.30%
• 3Y*: 43.69%
• 5Y*: 14.27%
• 10Y*: 26.04%

CI

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: -3.09%
• YTD: -1.09%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: -11.72%
• 3Y*: 3.66%
• 5Y*: 3.21%
• 10Y*: 8.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WILC vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WILC G. Willi-Food International Ltd.	19.39%	86.78%	62.56%	-17.53%	-26.06%	-5.71%	79.16%	70.96%	-2.78%	24.61%
CI Cigna Corporation	-1.09%	1.72%	-6.27%	-7.97%	46.68%	12.29%	1.83%	7.70%	-6.46%	52.29%

Correlation

The correlation between WILC and CI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 1997	0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap WILC : $469.58M CI : $71.48B
EPS WILC : $6.46 CI : $23.59
PE Ratio WILC : 5.23 CI : 11.48
PEG Ratio WILC : 0.19 CI : 0.66
PS Ratio WILC : 0.76 CI : 0.26
PB Ratio WILC : 0.72 CI : 1.69
Total Revenue (TTM) WILC : $618.86M CI : $277.94B
Gross Profit (TTM) WILC : $178.08M CI : $19.38B
EBITDA (TTM) WILC : $116.90M CI : $10.03B

Return for Risk

WILC vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WILC

WILC Risk / Return Rank: 93
WILC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
WILC Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
WILC Omega Ratio Rank: 90
WILC Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
WILC Martin Ratio Rank: 94

CI

CI Risk / Return Rank: 25
CI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
CI Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CI Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CI Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
CI Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WILC vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) and Cigna Corporation (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WILC	CI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	-0.36	+3.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.76	-0.26	+4.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	0.96	+0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.77	-0.44	+7.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.56	-0.81	+19.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WILC vs. CI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WILC Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the CI Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WILC and CI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WILC	CI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	-0.36	+3.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.11	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.28	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.34	-0.16

Drawdowns

WILC vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WILC drawdown since its inception was -90.34%, which is greater than CI's maximum drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WILC and CI.

Drawdown Indicators

	WILC	CI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.34%	-84.34%	-6.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.89%	-26.54%	+8.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.04%	-32.10%	-3.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.10%	-32.10%	-27.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.84%	-42.47%	-18.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.54%	-23.95%	+15.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.66%	-18.82%	-14.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.51%	14.47%	-7.96%

Volatility

WILC vs. CI - Volatility Comparison

G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Cigna Corporation (CI) at 8.14%. This indicates that WILC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WILC	CI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	8.14%	+4.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.60%	18.19%	+10.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.04%	32.75%	+6.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.32%	28.35%	+11.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.67%	30.71%	+9.96%

Dividends

WILC vs. CI - Dividend Comparison

WILC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than CI's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CI Cigna Corporation	1.69%	2.19%	2.03%	1.64%	1.35%	1.74%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%
WILC G. Willi-Food International Ltd.	2.76%	3.54%	1.23%	7.62%	9.04%	7.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	6.54%	0.00%

Financials

WILC vs. CI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between G. Willi-Food International Ltd. and Cigna Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

WILC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 48.95M and revenue of 156.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.

CI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WILC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. reported an operating income of 20.03M and revenue of 156.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

CI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

WILC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. reported a net income of 20.08M and revenue of 156.89M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

CI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WILC and CI in my portfolio?

WILC and CI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WILC or CI?

WILC has higher volatility (12.29%) compared to CI (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WILC dropped -90.34% vs CI's -84.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WILC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.