WILC vs. CI
WILC (G. Willi-Food International Ltd.) and CI (The Cigna Group) are both stocks. WILC operates in Food Distribution (Consumer Defensive), while CI operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, WILC returned 23.44%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for CI. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WILC vs. CI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WILC achieves a -5.20% return, which is significantly lower than CI's 2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, WILC has outperformed CI with an annualized return of 23.44%, while CI has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.
WILC
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -19.54%
- 6M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- -5.20%
- 1Y
- 31.45%
- 3Y*
- 33.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.17%
- 10Y*
- 23.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.73%
CI
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 8.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $460.57M | $474.33M | $477.27M | |
| $451.18K | $274.24K | $160.49K |
WILC vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WILC G. Willi-Food International Ltd. | -5.20% | 86.78% | 62.56% | -17.53% | -26.06% | -5.71% | 79.16% | 70.96% | -2.78% | 24.61% |
CI The Cigna Group | 2.54% | 1.72% | -6.27% | -7.97% | 46.68% | 12.29% | 1.83% | 7.70% | -6.46% | 52.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WILC and CI is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 1997 | 0.04 |
Fundamentals
WILC:
$372.69M
CI:
$73.82B
WILC:
₪6.50
CI:
$24.16
WILC:
12.59
CI:
11.55
WILC:
0.46
CI:
0.67
WILC:
1.84
CI:
0.26
WILC:
1.74
CI:
1.73
WILC:
₪618.86M
CI:
$282.38B
WILC:
₪178.08M
CI:
$17.96B
WILC:
₪116.90M
CI:
$9.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WILC vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank
WILC
CI
WILC vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) and The Cigna Group (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WILC | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.07 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | 0.31 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.42 | 0.74 | +2.68 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WILC vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WILC drawdown since its inception was -90.34%, which is greater than CI's maximum drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WILC and CI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WILC | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.34% | -84.34% | -6.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.13% | -21.41% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.94% | -32.10% | -2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.10% | -32.10% | -27.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -60.84% | -42.47% | -18.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.37% | -21.16% | -6.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.55% | -18.82% | -14.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.88% | 9.02% | -0.14% |
Volatility
WILC vs. CI - Volatility Comparison
G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) has a higher volatility of 15.53% compared to The Cigna Group (CI) at 10.65%. This indicates that WILC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WILC | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.53% | 10.65% | +4.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.85% | 20.43% | +12.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.56% | 33.83% | +6.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.46% | 28.73% | +11.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.77% | 30.70% | +10.07% |
Dividends
WILC vs. CI - Dividend Comparison
WILC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.47%, more than CI's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI The Cigna Group | 2.20% | 2.19% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
WILC G. Willi-Food International Ltd. | 3.47% | 3.54% | 1.23% | 7.62% | 9.04% | 7.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.54% | 0.00% |
Financials
WILC vs. CI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between G. Willi-Food International Ltd. and The Cigna Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WILC vs. CI - Profitability Comparison
WILC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 48.95M and revenue of 156.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.
CI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Cigna Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 71.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WILC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. reported an operating income of 20.03M and revenue of 156.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.
CI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Cigna Group reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 71.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
WILC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. reported a net income of 20.08M and revenue of 156.89M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.
CI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Cigna Group reported a net income of 1.66B and revenue of 71.67B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WILC and CI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WILC has higher volatility (15.53%) compared to CI (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WILC dropped -90.34% vs CI's -84.34%.
WILC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WILC and CI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer