PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WILC vs. ETON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WILC vs. ETON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WILC achieves a 19.39% return, which is significantly lower than ETON's 63.28% return.


WILC

1D
-3.57%
1M
5.47%
YTD
19.39%
6M
32.31%
1Y
120.30%
3Y*
43.69%
5Y*
14.27%
10Y*
26.04%

ETON

1D
0.77%
1M
-8.45%
YTD
63.28%
6M
67.33%
1Y
59.78%
3Y*
92.34%
5Y*
34.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WILC vs. ETON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WILC
G. Willi-Food International Ltd.
19.39%86.78%62.56%-17.53%-26.06%-5.71%79.16%70.96%2.04%
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc
63.28%26.95%204.11%55.32%-34.27%-47.23%12.92%17.65%-2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between WILC and ETON is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WILC:

$469.58M

ETON:

$871.01M

EPS

WILC:

$6.46

ETON:

-$0.05

PS Ratio

WILC:

0.76

ETON:

8.91

PB Ratio

WILC:

0.72

ETON:

28.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

WILC:

$618.86M

ETON:

$86.93M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WILC:

$178.08M

ETON:

$47.61M

EBITDA (TTM)

WILC:

$116.90M

ETON:

$5.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WILC vs. ETON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WILC
WILC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
WILC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WILC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WILC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
WILC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
WILC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

ETON
ETON Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
ETON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETON Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETON Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
ETON Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETON Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WILC vs. ETON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WILCETONDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.10

1.09

+2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.76

1.83

+1.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.23

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.77

1.66

+5.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.56

3.25

+15.31

WILC vs. ETON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WILC Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the ETON Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WILC and ETON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WILCETONDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

1.09

+2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.55

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.34

-0.17

Drawdowns

WILC vs. ETON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WILC drawdown since its inception was -90.34%, which is greater than ETON's maximum drawdown of -79.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WILC and ETON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WILCETONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.34%

-79.94%

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.89%

-36.17%

+18.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.04%

-45.65%

+9.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.10%

-70.42%

+11.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.54%

-21.11%

+12.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.66%

-37.68%

+4.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.51%

18.48%

-11.97%

Volatility

WILC vs. ETON - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for G. Willi-Food International Ltd. (WILC) is 12.29%, while Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON) has a volatility of 17.31%. This indicates that WILC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETON based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WILCETONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.29%

17.31%

-5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.60%

40.77%

-12.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.04%

55.75%

-16.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.32%

63.42%

-23.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.67%

63.94%

-23.27%

Dividends

WILC vs. ETON - Dividend Comparison

WILC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, while ETON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WILC
G. Willi-Food International Ltd.
2.76%3.54%1.23%7.62%9.04%7.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.54%

Financials

WILC vs. ETON - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between G. Willi-Food International Ltd. and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
156.89M
24.27M
(WILC) Total Revenue
(ETON) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WILC vs. ETON - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between G. Willi-Food International Ltd. and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
31.2%
60.7%
Portfolio components
WILC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. reported a gross profit of 48.95M and revenue of 156.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.2%.

ETON - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc reported a gross profit of 14.74M and revenue of 24.27M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.7%.

WILC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. reported an operating income of 20.03M and revenue of 156.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 12.8%.

ETON - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc reported an operating income of 2.41M and revenue of 24.27M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

WILC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, G. Willi-Food International Ltd. reported a net income of 20.08M and revenue of 156.89M, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

ETON - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc reported a net income of 1.55M and revenue of 24.27M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WILC and ETON have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETON has higher volatility (17.31%) compared to WILC (12.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WILC dropped -90.34% vs ETON's -79.94%.

WILC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WILC and ETON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer