WIBMX vs. WMRIX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WIBMX (Wilmington Broad Market Bond Fund) and WMRIX (Wilmington Real Asset Fund) are both mutual funds - WIBMX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Wilmington Funds, while WMRIX is a Global Allocation fund managed by Wilmington Funds. Over the past 5 years, WIBMX returned -0.20%/yr vs 5.46%/yr for WMRIX. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WIBMX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for WMRIX.

Performance

WIBMX vs. WMRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Broad Market Bond Fund (WIBMX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WIBMX achieves a 0.20% return, which is significantly lower than WMRIX's 11.89% return.

WIBMX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 0.20%
• 6M: 0.67%
• 1Y: 4.57%
• 3Y*: 3.61%
• 5Y*: -0.20%
• 10Y*: —

WMRIX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 11.89%
• 6M: 12.19%
• 1Y: 16.83%
• 3Y*: 9.91%
• 5Y*: 5.46%
• 10Y*: 5.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WIBMX vs. WMRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WIBMX Wilmington Broad Market Bond Fund	0.20%	7.13%	0.68%	5.10%	-12.80%	-1.86%	7.78%	8.33%	1.65%
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund	11.89%	12.79%	2.57%	1.12%	-8.03%	21.49%	-2.19%	16.85%	-6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between WIBMX and WMRIX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2018	0.12

The correlation between WIBMX and WMRIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

WIBMX vs. WMRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WIBMX

WIBMX Risk / Return Rank: 18
WIBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
WIBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
WIBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 17
WIBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
WIBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

WMRIX

WMRIX Risk / Return Rank: 47
WMRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
WMRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
WMRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
WMRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WMRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WIBMX vs. WMRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Broad Market Bond Fund (WIBMX) and Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WIBMX	WMRIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.85	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	2.50	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.33	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	2.61	-1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	10.58	-6.45

WIBMX vs. WMRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WIBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the WMRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WIBMX and WMRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WIBMX vs. WMRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WIBMX drawdown since its inception was -18.13%, smaller than the maximum WMRIX drawdown of -37.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WIBMX and WMRIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WIBMX	WMRIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.13%	-37.84%	+19.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.07%	-6.32%	+3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.97%	-10.95%	+4.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.64%	-22.03%	+4.39%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-6.32%	+3.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.83%	-7.17%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.11%	1.58%	-0.47%

Volatility

WIBMX vs. WMRIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilmington Broad Market Bond Fund (WIBMX) is 1.28%, while Wilmington Real Asset Fund (WMRIX) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that WIBMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WIBMX	WMRIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.28%	1.86%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.01%	6.78%	-3.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.97%	8.91%	-4.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.68%	11.48%	-5.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.11%	12.51%	-7.40%

WIBMX vs. WMRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WIBMX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than WMRIX's 0.64% expense ratio.

Dividends

WIBMX vs. WMRIX - Dividend Comparison

WIBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than WMRIX's 6.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WIBMX Wilmington Broad Market Bond Fund	3.81%	3.98%	2.89%	2.39%	1.87%	1.75%	2.33%	2.55%	0.88%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WMRIX Wilmington Real Asset Fund	6.37%	7.15%	1.02%	3.51%	6.07%	9.29%	1.99%	3.03%	2.84%	2.73%	0.00%	5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WIBMX and WMRIX in my portfolio?

WIBMX and WMRIX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WIBMX or WMRIX?

WMRIX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to WIBMX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WIBMX dropped -18.13% vs WMRIX's -37.84%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WMRIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.