PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WH vs. CHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WH vs. CHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Choice Hotels International, Inc. (CHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WH achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly lower than CHH's 12.51% return.


WH

1D
-1.68%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
6.60%
6M
9.60%
1Y
-2.40%
3Y*
5.66%
5Y*
2.98%
10Y*

CHH

1D
-3.54%
1M
8.47%
YTD
12.51%
6M
16.93%
1Y
-15.60%
3Y*
-1.73%
5Y*
-1.56%
10Y*
9.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WH vs. CHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WH
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
6.60%-23.54%27.70%14.94%-19.06%52.60%-4.15%41.40%-25.37%
CHH
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
12.51%-32.29%26.18%1.58%-27.10%46.69%3.57%45.92%-10.05%

Correlation

The correlation between WH and CHH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.72

The correlation between WH and CHH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

WH:

$2.52

CHH:

$9.91

PE Ratio

WH:

31.79

CHH:

10.75

PEG Ratio

WH:

10.23

CHH:

0.83

PS Ratio

WH:

4.26

CHH:

2.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

WH:

$1.44B

CHH:

$1.60B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WH:

$965.00M

CHH:

$863.19M

EBITDA (TTM)

WH:

$483.00M

CHH:

$630.73M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WH vs. CHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WH
WH Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
WH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
WH Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
WH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
WH Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CHH
CHH Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHH Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WH vs. CHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Choice Hotels International, Inc. (CHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHCHHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.08

-0.45

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.10

-0.42

+0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.95

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

-0.42

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.19

-0.74

+0.55

WH vs. CHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WH Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the CHH Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WH and CHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHCHHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

-0.45

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

-0.05

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.32

-0.17

Drawdowns

WH vs. CHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WH drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, roughly equal to the maximum CHH drawdown of -65.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WH and CHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHCHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.07%

-65.88%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.30%

-37.45%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.17%

-45.50%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-45.50%

+8.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.59%

-30.79%

+4.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.54%

-20.25%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.49%

21.06%

-8.57%

Volatility

WH vs. CHH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) is 9.69%, while Choice Hotels International, Inc. (CHH) has a volatility of 10.93%. This indicates that WH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHCHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.69%

10.93%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.64%

29.82%

-8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.56%

34.87%

-5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.51%

29.32%

+0.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.82%

29.53%

+6.29%

Dividends

WH vs. CHH - Dividend Comparison

WH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than CHH's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHH
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
1.08%1.21%0.61%1.02%1.05%0.29%0.21%0.84%1.20%1.11%1.48%1.57%
WH
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
2.07%2.17%1.51%1.74%1.79%0.98%0.94%1.85%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WH vs. CHH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Choice Hotels International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M450.00M20222023202420252026
327.00M
340.58M
(WH) Total Revenue
(CHH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WH vs. CHH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Choice Hotels International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
92.4%
63.6%
Portfolio components
WH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 302.00M and revenue of 327.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.4%.

CHH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Choice Hotels International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 216.67M and revenue of 340.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

WH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

CHH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Choice Hotels International, Inc. reported an operating income of 60.03M and revenue of 340.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

WH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 61.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.

CHH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Choice Hotels International, Inc. reported a net income of 20.30M and revenue of 340.58M, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WH and CHH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHH has higher volatility (10.93%) compared to WH (9.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WH dropped -66.07% vs CHH's -65.88%.

WH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WH and CHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer