PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WH vs. IHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WH vs. IHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WH achieves a 13.26% return, which is significantly lower than IHG's 22.41% return.


WH

1D
3.21%
1M
7.54%
YTD
13.26%
6M
11.38%
1Y
9.15%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*

IHG

1D
0.49%
1M
11.62%
YTD
22.41%
6M
20.51%
1Y
53.39%
3Y*
38.24%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*
18.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WH vs. IHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WH
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
13.26%-23.54%27.70%14.94%-19.06%52.60%-4.15%41.40%-29.23%
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
22.41%14.53%39.13%59.59%-8.70%0.14%-5.17%27.65%-15.83%

Correlation

The correlation between WH and IHG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2018

0.63

The correlation between WH and IHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WH:

$6.42B

IHG:

$26.28B

EPS

WH:

$2.52

IHG:

$8.92

PE Ratio

WH:

33.60

IHG:

19.15

PEG Ratio

WH:

10.81

IHG:

0.45

PS Ratio

WH:

4.50

IHG:

2.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

WH:

$1.44B

IHG:

$10.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WH:

$965.00M

IHG:

$4.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

WH:

$483.00M

IHG:

$2.53B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WH vs. IHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WH
WH Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
WH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
WH Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
WH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
WH Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

IHG
IHG Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WH vs. IHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WHIHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.35

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.38

4.11

-3.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.72

12.48

-11.76

WH vs. IHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WH Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the IHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WH and IHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WH vs. IHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WH drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, smaller than the maximum IHG drawdown of -77.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WH and IHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHIHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.07%

-77.84%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.30%

-13.04%

-11.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.17%

-28.92%

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-33.89%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.01%

-0.08%

-21.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.61%

-13.83%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.69%

4.29%

+8.40%

Volatility

WH vs. IHG - Volatility Comparison

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) has a higher volatility of 12.36% compared to InterContinental Hotels Group PLC (IHG) at 5.37%. This indicates that WH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHIHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.36%

5.37%

+6.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.19%

18.83%

+4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.77%

25.41%

+5.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.82%

26.75%

+3.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.92%

30.34%

+5.58%

Dividends

WH vs. IHG - Dividend Comparison

WH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, more than IHG's 1.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group PLC
1.08%1.23%1.26%1.57%2.22%0.00%0.00%5.52%1.97%8.04%30.47%2.72%
WH
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
1.98%2.17%1.51%1.74%1.79%0.98%0.94%1.85%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

WH vs. IHG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
327.00M
2.67B
(WH) Total Revenue
(IHG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WH vs. IHG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and InterContinental Hotels Group PLC over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
92.4%
36.7%
Portfolio components
WH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 302.00M and revenue of 327.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.4%.

IHG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a gross profit of 979.00M and revenue of 2.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.

WH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

IHG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported an operating income of 575.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.5%.

WH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 61.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.

IHG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, InterContinental Hotels Group PLC reported a net income of 289.00M and revenue of 2.67B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WH and IHG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WH has higher volatility (12.36%) compared to IHG (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WH dropped -66.07% vs IHG's -77.84%.

IHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WH and IHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer