PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WH vs. PK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WH vs. PK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WH achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than PK's 32.39% return.


WH

1D
2.98%
1M
0.79%
YTD
8.42%
6M
12.78%
1Y
0.58%
3Y*
6.26%
5Y*
3.59%
10Y*

PK

1D
1.27%
1M
22.46%
YTD
32.39%
6M
32.60%
1Y
45.08%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WH vs. PK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
WH
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
8.42%-23.54%27.70%14.94%-19.06%52.60%-4.15%41.40%-25.37%
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
32.39%-18.45%0.98%49.45%-36.03%10.09%-30.13%6.86%-10.45%

Correlation

The correlation between WH and PK is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018

0.61

The correlation between WH and PK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WH:

$6.18B

PK:

$2.70B

EPS

WH:

$2.52

PK:

-$1.08

PS Ratio

WH:

4.33

PK:

1.06

PB Ratio

WH:

13.82

PK:

0.88

Total Revenue (TTM)

WH:

$1.44B

PK:

$2.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WH:

$965.00M

PK:

-$119.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

WH:

$483.00M

PK:

$291.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WH vs. PK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WH
WH Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
WH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
WH Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
WH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
WH Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

PK
PK Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
PK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PK Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PK Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WH vs. PK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WHPKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.02

1.41

-1.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.25

2.23

-1.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.24

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

2.65

-2.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.04

6.74

-6.70

WH vs. PK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WH Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the PK Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WH and PK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WHPKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

1.41

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

-0.02

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

-0.00

+0.15

Drawdowns

WH vs. PK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WH drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, smaller than the maximum PK drawdown of -84.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WH and PK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WHPKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.07%

-84.22%

+18.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.30%

-17.08%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.17%

-44.83%

+7.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.17%

-49.83%

+12.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.33%

-33.49%

+8.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.54%

-34.08%

+17.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.47%

6.71%

+5.76%

Volatility

WH vs. PK - Volatility Comparison

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) have volatilities of 9.56% and 10.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WHPKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.56%

10.06%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.57%

22.60%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.52%

32.15%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.50%

37.60%

-8.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.82%

46.10%

-10.28%

Dividends

WH vs. PK - Dividend Comparison

WH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than PK's 7.40% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PK
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
7.40%9.56%9.95%14.05%2.37%0.00%2.62%7.34%12.86%16.10%
WH
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
2.04%2.17%1.51%1.74%1.79%0.98%0.94%1.85%1.65%0.00%

Financials

WH vs. PK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
327.00M
622.00M
(WH) Total Revenue
(PK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WH vs. PK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
92.4%
0
Portfolio components
WH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 302.00M and revenue of 327.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.4%.

PK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 622.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

WH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

PK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported an operating income of 62.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

WH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 61.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.

PK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a net income of 11.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WH and PK have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PK has higher volatility (10.06%) compared to WH (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WH dropped -66.07% vs PK's -84.22%.

PK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WH and PK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer