WH vs. PK
WH (Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.) and PK (Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.) are both stocks. WH operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical), while PK operates in REIT - Hotel & Motel (Real Estate). Over the past 5 years, WH returned 3.59%/yr vs -0.84%/yr for PK. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
WH vs. PK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WH achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than PK's 32.39% return.
WH
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 0.58%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- —
PK
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 22.46%
- YTD
- 32.39%
- 6M
- 32.60%
- 1Y
- 45.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- —
WH vs. PK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 8.42% | -23.54% | 27.70% | 14.94% | -19.06% | 52.60% | -4.15% | 41.40% | -25.37% |
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 32.39% | -18.45% | 0.98% | 49.45% | -36.03% | 10.09% | -30.13% | 6.86% | -10.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between WH and PK is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018 | 0.61 |
The correlation between WH and PK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
WH:
$6.18B
PK:
$2.70B
WH:
$2.52
PK:
-$1.08
WH:
4.33
PK:
1.06
WH:
13.82
PK:
0.88
WH:
$1.44B
PK:
$2.53B
WH:
$965.00M
PK:
-$119.00M
WH:
$483.00M
PK:
$291.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WH vs. PK — Risk / Return Rank
WH
PK
WH vs. PK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WH | PK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 1.41 | -1.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.25 | 2.23 | -1.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.24 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.02 | 2.65 | -2.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.04 | 6.74 | -6.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WH | PK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.41 | -1.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | -0.02 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | -0.00 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
WH vs. PK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WH drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, smaller than the maximum PK drawdown of -84.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WH and PK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WH | PK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.07% | -84.22% | +18.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.30% | -17.08% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.17% | -44.83% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.17% | -49.83% | +12.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.33% | -33.49% | +8.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.54% | -34.08% | +17.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.47% | 6.71% | +5.76% |
Volatility
WH vs. PK - Volatility Comparison
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) have volatilities of 9.56% and 10.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WH | PK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.56% | 10.06% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.57% | 22.60% | -1.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.52% | 32.15% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.50% | 37.60% | -8.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.82% | 46.10% | -10.28% |
Dividends
WH vs. PK - Dividend Comparison
WH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than PK's 7.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. | 7.40% | 9.56% | 9.95% | 14.05% | 2.37% | 0.00% | 2.62% | 7.34% | 12.86% | 16.10% |
WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. | 2.04% | 2.17% | 1.51% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 0.98% | 0.94% | 1.85% | 1.65% | 0.00% |
Financials
WH vs. PK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WH vs. PK - Profitability Comparison
WH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a gross profit of 302.00M and revenue of 327.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 92.4%.
PK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 622.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported an operating income of 114.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
PK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported an operating income of 62.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
WH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. reported a net income of 61.00M and revenue of 327.00M, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.
PK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. reported a net income of 11.00M and revenue of 622.00M, resulting in a net margin of 1.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WH and PK have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PK has higher volatility (10.06%) compared to WH (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WH dropped -66.07% vs PK's -84.22%.
PK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WH and PK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer