WH vs. PK

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK).

Performance

WH vs. PK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WH vs. PK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.	8.09%	-23.54%	27.70%	14.94%	-19.06%	52.60%	-4.15%	41.40%	-25.37%
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.	3.11%	-18.45%	0.98%	49.45%	-36.03%	10.09%	-30.13%	6.86%	-10.45%

Fundamentals

Market Cap WH : $6.15B PK : $2.10B
EPS WH : $2.51 PK : -$1.42
PS Ratio WH : 4.37 PK : 0.83
PB Ratio WH : 13.14 PK : 0.67
Total Revenue (TTM) WH : $1.43B PK : $2.54B
Gross Profit (TTM) WH : $1.26B PK : $50.00M
EBITDA (TTM) WH : $482.00M PK : $333.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WH achieves a 8.09% return, which is significantly higher than PK's 3.11% return.

WH

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 8.09%
• 6M: 2.77%
• 1Y: -8.38%
• 3Y*: 8.25%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: —

PK

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: 3.11%
• 6M: -0.36%
• 1Y: 8.24%
• 3Y*: 6.12%
• 5Y*: -6.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WH vs. PK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WH

WH Risk / Return Rank: 30
WH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
WH Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
WH Omega Ratio Rank: 27
WH Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
WH Martin Ratio Rank: 32

PK

PK Risk / Return Rank: 50
PK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
PK Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PK Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PK Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PK Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WH vs. PK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WH	PK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	0.22	-0.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	0.63	-0.78
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.07	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	0.46	-0.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.58	1.11	-1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WH vs. PK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WH Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the PK Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WH and PK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WH	PK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	0.22	-0.48
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	-0.18	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.15	-0.06	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between WH and PK is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

WH vs. PK - Dividend Comparison

WH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than PK's 9.50% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WH Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.	2.04%	2.17%	1.51%	1.74%	1.79%	0.98%	0.94%	1.85%	1.65%	0.00%
PK Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.	9.50%	9.56%	9.95%	14.05%	2.37%	0.00%	2.62%	7.34%	12.86%	16.10%

Drawdowns

WH vs. PK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WH drawdown since its inception was -66.07%, smaller than the maximum PK drawdown of -84.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WH and PK.

Drawdown Indicators

	WH	PK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.07%	-84.22%	+18.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.30%	-18.58%	-5.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.17%	-51.30%	+14.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.56%	-48.20%	+22.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.38%	-33.89%	+17.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.90%	7.69%	+5.21%

Volatility

WH vs. PK - Volatility Comparison

Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (WH) and Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) have volatilities of 8.71% and 9.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WH	PK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.71%	9.13%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.39%	22.42%	-1.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.85%	36.96%	-4.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.32%	37.53%	-8.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.93%	46.29%	-10.36%

Financials