CHH vs. SPYG
CHH (Choice Hotels International, Inc.) is a stock, while SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, CHH returned 10.47%/yr vs 18.05%/yr for SPYG. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CHH vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CHH achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly higher than SPYG's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CHH has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 10.47%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.
CHH
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 6M
- 18.67%
- 1Y
- -8.82%
- 3Y*
- 0.89%
- 5Y*
- -0.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.47%
SPYG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
CHH vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHH Choice Hotels International, Inc. | 17.84% | -32.29% | 26.18% | 1.58% | -27.10% | 46.69% | 3.57% | 45.92% | -6.72% | 40.23% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CHH and SPYG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CHH and SPYG has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CHH vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
CHH
SPYG
CHH vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Choice Hotels International, Inc. (CHH) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CHH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.28 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.24 | 1.96 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 7.79 | -8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CHH vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CHH drawdown since its inception was -65.88%, roughly equal to the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CHH and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CHH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.88% | -67.63% | +1.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.45% | -13.76% | -23.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.50% | -22.14% | -23.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.50% | -32.67% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.50% | -32.67% | -17.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.52% | -5.52% | -22.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.26% | -24.28% | +4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.44% | 3.46% | +17.98% |
Volatility
CHH vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
Choice Hotels International, Inc. (CHH) has a higher volatility of 12.68% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) at 7.26%. This indicates that CHH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CHH | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.68% | 7.26% | +5.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.59% | 13.90% | +16.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.95% | 17.26% | +18.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.64% | 21.36% | +8.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.67% | 20.73% | +8.94% |
Dividends
CHH vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
CHH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHH Choice Hotels International, Inc. | 1.03% | 1.21% | 0.61% | 1.02% | 1.05% | 0.29% | 0.21% | 0.84% | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.48% | 1.57% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CHH and SPYG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHH has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to SPYG (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CHH dropped -65.88% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CHH and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer