PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WGS vs. DBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WGS vs. DBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -59.23% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.


WGS

1D
-0.21%
1M
-21.95%
YTD
-59.23%
6M
-66.94%
1Y
-27.18%
3Y*
101.82%
5Y*
-33.09%
10Y*

DBO

1D
2.27%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
84.75%
6M
81.10%
1Y
80.26%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WGS vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
WGS
GeneDx Holdings Corp.
-59.23%69.22%2,694.91%-68.41%-94.09%-59.60%12.65%
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
84.75%-11.71%7.85%-4.44%13.04%60.74%20.77%

Correlation

The correlation between WGS and DBO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2020

0.03

The correlation between WGS and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WGS vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WGS
WGS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
WGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
WGS Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
WGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
WGS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DBO
DBO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
DBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
DBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WGS vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WGSDBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.38

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

4.44

-4.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.74

9.02

-9.76

WGS vs. DBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the DBO Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WGS and DBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WGSDBODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

2.34

-2.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

0.50

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

0.02

-0.28

Drawdowns

WGS vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than DBO's maximum drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and DBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WGSDBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.85%

-90.18%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.40%

-18.19%

-61.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-84.28%

-28.20%

-56.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.73%

-37.68%

-62.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.78%

-51.38%

-42.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.36%

-62.25%

-21.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.97%

8.92%

+28.05%

Volatility

WGS vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison

GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) has a higher volatility of 72.31% compared to Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) at 12.61%. This indicates that WGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WGSDBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

72.31%

12.61%

+59.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

83.67%

28.20%

+55.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.86%

34.46%

+49.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

109.84%

32.29%

+77.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

107.46%

31.78%

+75.68%

Dividends

WGS vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison

WGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBO
Invesco DB Oil Fund
1.90%3.51%4.68%4.59%0.66%0.00%0.00%1.63%1.58%
WGS
GeneDx Holdings Corp.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WGS and DBO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WGS has higher volatility (72.31%) compared to DBO (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGS dropped -99.85% vs DBO's -90.18%.

DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WGS and DBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer