WGS vs. DBO
WGS (GeneDx Holdings Corp.) is a stock, while DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) is Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Over the past 5 years, WGS returned -33.09%/yr vs 15.98%/yr for DBO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WGS vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGS achieves a -59.23% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 84.75% return.
WGS
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -21.95%
- YTD
- -59.23%
- 6M
- -66.94%
- 1Y
- -27.18%
- 3Y*
- 101.82%
- 5Y*
- -33.09%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 84.75%
- 6M
- 81.10%
- 1Y
- 80.26%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.98%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
WGS vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | -59.23% | 69.22% | 2,694.91% | -68.41% | -94.09% | -59.60% | 12.65% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 84.75% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | 20.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGS and DBO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2020 | 0.03 |
The correlation between WGS and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGS vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
WGS
DBO
WGS vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WGS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.38 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 4.44 | -4.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 9.02 | -9.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WGS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 2.34 | -2.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 0.50 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.26 | 0.02 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
WGS vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGS drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than DBO's maximum drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGS and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -90.18% | -9.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.40% | -18.19% | -61.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.28% | -28.20% | -56.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.73% | -37.68% | -62.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.78% | -51.38% | -42.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -62.25% | -21.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.97% | 8.92% | +28.05% |
Volatility
WGS vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
GeneDx Holdings Corp. (WGS) has a higher volatility of 72.31% compared to Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) at 12.61%. This indicates that WGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGS | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 72.31% | 12.61% | +59.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.67% | 28.20% | +55.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.86% | 34.46% | +49.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 109.84% | 32.29% | +77.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 107.46% | 31.78% | +75.68% |
Dividends
WGS vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
WGS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.90% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
WGS GeneDx Holdings Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WGS and DBO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGS has higher volatility (72.31%) compared to DBO (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGS dropped -99.85% vs DBO's -90.18%.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGS and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer