WGROX vs. FMDE
WGROX (Wasatch Core Growth Fund) and FMDE (Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF) are both funds - WGROX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Wasatch, while FMDE is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past year, WGROX returned -2.58% vs 21.18% for FMDE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WGROX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for FMDE.
Performance
WGROX vs. FMDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WGROX achieves a 2.95% return, which is significantly lower than FMDE's 10.64% return.
WGROX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 2.95%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- -2.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 0.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
FMDE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WGROX vs. FMDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 2.95% | -10.37% | 13.13% | 14.03% |
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 10.64% | 12.19% | 21.76% | 8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between WGROX and FMDE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between WGROX and FMDE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WGROX vs. FMDE — Risk / Return Rank
WGROX
FMDE
WGROX vs. FMDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) and Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WGROX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.28 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 2.55 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 10.11 | -10.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WGROX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 1.57 | -1.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.36 | -0.81 |
Drawdowns
WGROX vs. FMDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WGROX drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, which is greater than FMDE's maximum drawdown of -21.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WGROX and FMDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WGROX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.61% | -21.10% | -40.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.89% | -8.33% | -7.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.48% | 0.00% | -16.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -2.64% | -7.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.32% | 2.10% | +4.22% |
Volatility
WGROX vs. FMDE - Volatility Comparison
Wasatch Core Growth Fund (WGROX) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF (FMDE) at 3.16%. This indicates that WGROX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WGROX | FMDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 3.16% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.08% | 9.81% | +4.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.17% | 13.59% | +5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 16.12% | +6.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 16.12% | +7.21% |
WGROX vs. FMDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WGROX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDE's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
WGROX vs. FMDE - Dividend Comparison
WGROX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.31%, more than FMDE's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMDE Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap ETF | 1.10% | 1.23% | 1.11% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WGROX Wasatch Core Growth Fund | 8.31% | 8.55% | 9.22% | 0.00% | 0.71% | 16.82% | 7.21% | 10.73% | 10.14% | 6.24% | 0.15% | 12.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WGROX and FMDE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WGROX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to FMDE (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WGROX dropped -61.61% vs FMDE's -21.10%.
FMDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WGROX and FMDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer