WFIG vs. PCL
WFIG (WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund) and PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. WFIG is passively managed, while PCL is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WFIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for PCL.
Performance
WFIG vs. PCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WFIG achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than PCL's 0.10% return.
WFIG
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -0.62%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 2.39%
PCL
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WFIG vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WFIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 0.11% | 3.31% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 0.10% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between WFIG and PCL is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WFIG vs. PCL — Risk / Return Rank
WFIG
PCL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WFIG vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund (WFIG) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WFIG | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WFIG vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WFIG drawdown since its inception was -22.92%, which is greater than PCL's maximum drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIG and PCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WFIG | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.92% | -5.14% | -17.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.22% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -2.85% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -1.70% | -3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility
WFIG vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WFIG | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.10% | 7.84% | -3.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.11% | 7.84% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.55% | 7.84% | -0.29% |
WFIG vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
WFIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than PCL's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WFIG vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison
WFIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, less than PCL's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 5.86% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WFIG WisdomTree U.S. Corporate Bond Fund | 4.93% | 4.82% | 4.67% | 4.19% | 4.25% | 2.50% | 2.61% | 3.00% | 3.27% | 2.88% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, WFIG and PCL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WFIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WFIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCL.
PCL has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 4.93% for WFIG.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WFIG and 0.25% for PCL.
Find the right allocation for WFIG and PCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer