WELJ.DE vs. GLUX.DE
WELJ.DE (Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and GLUX.DE (Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds from Amundi - WELJ.DE tracks the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Discretionary while GLUX.DE tracks the S&P Global Luxury. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WELJ.DE returned 9.08%/yr vs -0.97%/yr for GLUX.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WELJ.DE charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GLUX.DE.
Performance
WELJ.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELJ.DE achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly higher than GLUX.DE's -7.03% return.
WELJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.53%
- YTD
- -1.85%
- 6M
- -2.00%
- 1Y
- 6.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GLUX.DE
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -6.73%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- -0.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
WELJ.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WELJ.DE Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -1.85% | -4.79% | 29.73% | 30.43% | -8.02% |
GLUX.DE Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR | -7.03% | 2.34% | 4.43% | 11.98% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between WELJ.DE and GLUX.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022 | 0.73 |
The correlation between WELJ.DE and GLUX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WELJ.DE vs. GLUX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WELJ.DE
GLUX.DE
WELJ.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE) and Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WELJ.DE | GLUX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.04 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 0.16 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.20 | 0.39 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WELJ.DE | GLUX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.13 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.44 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
WELJ.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.28%, smaller than the maximum GLUX.DE drawdown of -43.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELJ.DE and GLUX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WELJ.DE | GLUX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.28% | -43.20% | +14.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.62% | -16.00% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.28% | -27.94% | -0.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.41% | -14.70% | +4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -9.35% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.36% | 6.51% | -1.15% |
Volatility
WELJ.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE) is 5.07%, while Amundi S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF EUR (GLUX.DE) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that WELJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLUX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WELJ.DE | GLUX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.07% | 5.55% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 15.60% | -3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.84% | 19.60% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 21.08% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 20.94% | -2.76% |
WELJ.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WELJ.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than GLUX.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WELJ.DE vs. GLUX.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WELJ.DE nor GLUX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WELJ.DE and GLUX.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WELJ.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WELJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GLUX.DE.
WELJ.DE tracks S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Discretionary, while GLUX.DE tracks S&P Global Luxury. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WELJ.DE and 0.25% for GLUX.DE.
Find the right allocation for WELJ.DE and GLUX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer