WELJ.DE vs. XDWC.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.DE).
WELJ.DE and XDWC.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WELJ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P Developed Ex-Korea LargeMidCap Sustainability Enhanced Consumer Discretionary. It was launched on Sep 20, 2022. XDWC.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Mar 14, 2016. Both WELJ.DE and XDWC.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: WELJ.DE or XDWC.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between WELJ.DE and XDWC.DE is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
WELJ.DE vs. XDWC.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
WELJ.DE:
1.50
XDWC.DE:
1.68
WELJ.DE:
2.04
XDWC.DE:
2.21
WELJ.DE:
1.28
XDWC.DE:
1.32
WELJ.DE:
2.05
XDWC.DE:
1.75
WELJ.DE:
6.68
XDWC.DE:
7.48
WELJ.DE:
3.63%
XDWC.DE:
3.42%
WELJ.DE:
16.19%
XDWC.DE:
15.29%
WELJ.DE:
-13.05%
XDWC.DE:
-35.13%
WELJ.DE:
-4.67%
XDWC.DE:
-3.41%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WELJ.DE achieves a -0.56% return, which is significantly lower than XDWC.DE's 1.25% return.
WELJ.DE
-0.56%
-1.91%
24.50%
23.89%
N/A
N/A
XDWC.DE
1.25%
-0.66%
25.45%
25.38%
12.64%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WELJ.DE vs. XDWC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WELJ.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWC.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
WELJ.DE vs. XDWC.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
WELJ.DE
XDWC.DE
WELJ.DE vs. XDWC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
WELJ.DE vs. XDWC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WELJ.DE nor XDWC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WELJ.DE vs. XDWC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WELJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -13.05%, smaller than the maximum XDWC.DE drawdown of -35.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WELJ.DE and XDWC.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
WELJ.DE vs. XDWC.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi S&P Global Consumer Discretionary ESG UCITS ETF EUR Acc (WELJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Discretionary UCITS ETF 1C (XDWC.DE) at 3.93%. This indicates that WELJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.