PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WEBL vs. HOOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WEBL vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WEBL vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a -38.49% return, which is significantly higher than HOOG's -68.49% return.


WEBL

1D
10.51%
1M
-13.07%
YTD
-38.49%
6M
-47.90%
1Y
-10.71%
3Y*
23.40%
5Y*
-24.23%
10Y*

HOOG

1D
12.50%
1M
-20.36%
YTD
-68.49%
6M
-83.51%
1Y
42.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WEBL vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WEBL vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WEBL
WEBL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
WEBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEBL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
WEBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEBL Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOG
HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WEBL vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WEBLHOOGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.15

0.30

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.29

1.49

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.18

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

0.47

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.55

1.00

-1.54

WEBL vs. HOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WEBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the HOOG Sharpe Ratio of 0.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WEBL and HOOG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WEBLHOOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

0.30

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.06

0.16

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between WEBL and HOOG is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

WEBL vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than HOOG's 39.05% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
WEBL
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares
0.32%0.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.79%0.00%0.06%
HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF
39.05%12.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WEBL vs. HOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than HOOG's maximum drawdown of -86.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and HOOG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WEBLHOOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.44%

-86.94%

-7.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.57%

-86.94%

+30.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.89%

-85.30%

+3.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.44%

-29.96%

-28.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.61%

41.02%

-18.41%

Volatility

WEBL vs. HOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) is 22.01%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG) has a volatility of 35.72%. This indicates that WEBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WEBLHOOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.01%

35.72%

-13.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.90%

101.26%

-56.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

71.97%

143.11%

-71.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

80.81%

143.89%

-63.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.50%

143.89%

-60.39%