WEBL vs. TQQQ
WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - WEBL tracks the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%) while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WEBL returned -19.94%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for TQQQ. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. WEBL charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.
Performance
WEBL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 29.42% return.
WEBL
- 1D
- 9.12%
- 1M
- 16.81%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- -1.72%
- 3Y*
- 31.94%
- 5Y*
- -19.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.02%
TQQQ
- 1D
- 5.17%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- 6M
- 23.83%
- YTD
- 29.42%
- 1Y
- 64.98%
- 3Y*
- 50.64%
- 5Y*
- 16.02%
- 10Y*
- 39.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 42.74%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.46B | $4.47B | $5.36B | |
| $5.15M | $4.84M | $6.44M |
WEBL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.79% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 165.50% | -91.04% | 2.73% | 132.56% | 10.36% |
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 29.42% | 34.35% | 58.27% | 198.04% | -79.09% | 82.98% | 110.05% | 20.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBL and TQQQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between WEBL and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WEBL vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WEBL
TQQQ
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
WEBL
TQQQ
Consumer Cyclical
WEBL
TQQQ
Communication Services
WEBL
TQQQ
Financial Services
WEBL
TQQQ
Healthcare
WEBL
TQQQ
Industrials
WEBL
TQQQ
Basic Materials
WEBL
-
TQQQ
Consumer Defensive
WEBL
-
TQQQ
Energy
WEBL
-
TQQQ
Real Estate
WEBL
-
TQQQ
Utilities
WEBL
-
TQQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
WEBL
TQQQ
WEBL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.21 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 1.77 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.06 | 4.90 | -4.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and TQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -81.66% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.57% | -36.97% | -19.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.82% | -58.04% | -2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.44% | -81.66% | -12.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -81.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.33% | -21.90% | -48.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.21% | -18.50% | -40.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.95% | 13.31% | +15.64% |
Volatility
WEBL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) is 19.20%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 20.63%. This indicates that WEBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBL | TQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.20% | 20.63% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.14% | 47.88% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.73% | 57.57% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.30% | 68.10% | +13.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.59% | 66.61% | +15.98% |
WEBL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison
WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than TQQQ's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ | 0.56% | 0.65% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.16% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBL and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TQQQ has higher volatility (20.63%) compared to WEBL (19.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.
On 5-year performance, TQQQ leads with 16.02% vs -19.94% for WEBL. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, WEBL has been the lower-risk option at 19.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 16.02% return vs -19.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.
TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.16% for WEBL.
WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for WEBL and 0.95% for TQQQ.
TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBL and TQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer