WEBL vs. HDV
WEBL (Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WEBL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WEBL returned -23.34%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for HDV. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WEBL charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
WEBL vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEBL achieves a -19.84% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.57% return.
WEBL
- 1D
- -6.56%
- 1M
- -16.40%
- YTD
- -19.84%
- 6M
- -21.98%
- 1Y
- -13.17%
- 3Y*
- 26.91%
- 5Y*
- -23.34%
- 10Y*
- —
HDV
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.31%
WEBL vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | -19.84% | 2.37% | 76.78% | 165.50% | -91.04% | 2.73% | 132.56% | 10.36% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.57% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEBL and HDV is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.29 |
The correlation between WEBL and HDV shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WEBL vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WEBL
HDV
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
WEBL
HDV
Communication Services
WEBL
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
WEBL
HDV
Financial Services
WEBL
HDV
Industrials
WEBL
HDV
Healthcare
WEBL
HDV
Basic Materials
WEBL
-
HDV
Consumer Defensive
WEBL
-
HDV
Energy
WEBL
-
HDV
Real Estate
WEBL
-
HDV
-
Utilities
WEBL
-
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEBL vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
WEBL
HDV
WEBL vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WEBL | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.34 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 3.79 | -4.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.49 | 10.39 | -10.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WEBL vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEBL drawdown since its inception was -94.44%, which is greater than HDV's maximum drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEBL and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEBL | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.44% | -37.04% | -57.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.57% | -5.18% | -51.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.82% | -10.49% | -50.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.44% | -15.42% | -79.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.40% | -2.65% | -73.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.95% | -3.08% | -55.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.84% | 1.89% | +24.95% |
Volatility
WEBL vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares (WEBL) has a higher volatility of 22.93% compared to iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) at 3.37%. This indicates that WEBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEBL | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.93% | 3.37% | +19.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.83% | 7.52% | +39.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.99% | 9.87% | +49.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.00% | 12.80% | +68.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.87% | 15.74% | +67.13% |
WEBL vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEBL has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEBL vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
WEBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than HDV's 2.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.94% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
WEBL Daily Dow Jones Internet Bull 3X Shares | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.79% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEBL and HDV have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEBL has higher volatility (22.93%) compared to HDV (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEBL dropped -94.44% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 5-year performance, HDV leads with 10.90% vs -23.34% for WEBL. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDV has performed better with a 10.90% return vs -23.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for WEBL.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 0.25% for WEBL.
WEBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HDV is Dividend. WEBL tracks Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (300%), while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for WEBL and 0.08% for HDV.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEBL and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer