WEAT vs. RSMV
WEAT (Teucrium Wheat Fund) and RSMV (Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WEAT is a Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark, while RSMV is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Teucrium. WEAT is passively managed, while RSMV is actively managed. Over the past year, WEAT returned -0.35% vs 25.46% for RSMV. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. WEAT charges 1.91%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for RSMV.
Performance
WEAT vs. RSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WEAT achieves a 13.52% return, which is significantly higher than RSMV's 8.93% return.
WEAT
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- 13.52%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- -0.35%
- 3Y*
- -10.48%
- 5Y*
- -7.95%
- 10Y*
- -6.84%
RSMV
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 7.76%
- YTD
- 8.93%
- 6M
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 25.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WEAT vs. RSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 13.52% | -17.31% |
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF | 8.93% | 11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between WEAT and RSMV is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2025 | -0.06 |
The correlation between WEAT and RSMV shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WEAT vs. RSMV — Risk / Return Rank
WEAT
RSMV
WEAT vs. RSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) and Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WEAT | RSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.38 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 3.52 | -3.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.03 | 13.44 | -13.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WEAT | RSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | 2.14 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 1.02 | -1.43 |
Drawdowns
WEAT vs. RSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WEAT drawdown since its inception was -84.32%, which is greater than RSMV's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WEAT and RSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WEAT | RSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.32% | -17.58% | -66.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.85% | -7.27% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.83% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.12% | -0.83% | -81.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.12% | -3.97% | -59.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.29% | 1.90% | +9.39% |
Volatility
WEAT vs. RSMV - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF (RSMV) at 4.52%. This indicates that WEAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WEAT | RSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 4.52% | +5.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.05% | 9.67% | +8.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.62% | 11.94% | +10.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.51% | 14.54% | +15.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.80% | 14.54% | +12.26% |
WEAT vs. RSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
WEAT has a 1.91% expense ratio, which is higher than RSMV's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
WEAT vs. RSMV - Dividend Comparison
WEAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
RSMV Relative Strength Managed Volatility Strategy ETF | 0.92% | 1.00% |
WEAT Teucrium Wheat Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WEAT and RSMV have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WEAT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to RSMV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WEAT dropped -84.32% vs RSMV's -17.58%.
On 1-year performance, RSMV leads with 25.46% vs -0.35% for WEAT. On fees, RSMV is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, RSMV has been the lower-risk option at 4.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSMV has performed better with a 25.46% return vs -0.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSMV is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.
RSMV has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for WEAT.
WEAT is categorized as Agricultural Commodities, while RSMV is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.91% for WEAT and 0.95% for RSMV.
RSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WEAT and RSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer