WDTE vs. RYLD

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

WDTE (Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF) and RYLD (Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. WDTE is actively managed, while RYLD is passively managed. Over the past year, WDTE returned 18.84% vs 26.26% for RYLD. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. WDTE charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RYLD.

Performance

WDTE vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF (WDTE) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than RYLD's 13.48% return.

WDTE

• 1D: 1.35%
• 1M: 1.73%
• 6M: 9.63%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 1Y: 18.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.37%

RYLD

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 2.27%
• 6M: 10.40%
• YTD: 13.48%
• 1Y: 26.26%
• 3Y*: 8.70%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	$9.87M	$9.43M	$9.08M
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF	$430.65K	$531.30K	$694.88K

WDTE vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF	11.48%	13.60%	9.85%	5.71%
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	13.48%	5.65%	10.13%	-0.46%

Correlation

The correlation between WDTE and RYLD is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023	0.65

The correlation between WDTE and RYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDTE vs. RYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WDTE	RYLD
Technology	39.0%	14.5%
Financial Services	11.1%	17.8%
Communication Services	10.6%	2.2%
Consumer Cyclical	9.9%	9.2%
Healthcare	8.3%	20.3%
Industrials	7.8%	14.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.5%	2.6%
Energy	3.1%	5.5%
Utilities	2.1%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.8%	6.8%
Basic Materials	1.7%	4.4%

Return for Risk

WDTE vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WDTE

WDTE Risk / Return Rank: 72
WDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
WDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 75
WDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
WDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 80

RYLD

RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 93
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WDTE vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF (WDTE) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WDTE	RYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	2.50	-0.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.52	-1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.52	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	4.19	-1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.83	17.17	-6.35

WDTE vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is lower than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDTE and RYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WDTE vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and RYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	WDTE	RYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.85%	-41.53%	+25.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.65%	-6.29%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.05%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.82%	-8.65%	+6.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.74%	1.53%	+0.21%

Volatility

WDTE vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF (WDTE) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 2.30%. This indicates that WDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WDTE	RYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	2.30%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	7.74%	+1.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.24%	10.58%	+0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.44%	13.98%	-2.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.44%	17.04%	-5.60%

WDTE vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDTE has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

WDTE vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.49%, more than RYLD's 11.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF	11.50%	12.00%	12.03%	12.64%	13.49%	12.35%	10.76%	6.43%
WDTE Defiance S&P 500 Weekly Distribution ETF	32.49%	35.78%	51.80%	16.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WDTE and RYLD in my portfolio?

WDTE and RYLD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WDTE or RYLD?

WDTE has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to RYLD (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs RYLD's -41.53%.

Which ETF is better, WDTE or RYLD?

On 1-year performance, RYLD leads with 26.26% vs 18.84% for WDTE. On fees, RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, RYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WDTE or RYLD?

Over the 1-year period, RYLD has performed better with a 26.26% return vs 18.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WDTE or RYLD?

RYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for WDTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WDTE or RYLD?

WDTE has the higher dividend yield at 32.49%, compared with 11.50% for RYLD.

What is the main difference between WDTE and RYLD?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.03% for WDTE and 0.60% for RYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.