PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDTE vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDTE vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly higher than QYLD's 7.88% return.


WDTE

1D
-0.53%
1M
4.43%
YTD
10.59%
6M
11.04%
1Y
24.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.88%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.93%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDTE vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
10.59%13.60%9.85%5.84%
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
7.88%9.28%19.35%4.70%

Correlation

The correlation between WDTE and QYLD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.79

The correlation between WDTE and QYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDTE vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDTE
QYLD

Technology

35.6%
53.8%

Financial Services

11.8%
0.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
4.2%

Industrials

8.3%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.7%

Energy

3.5%
0.6%

Utilities

2.4%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.1%

Technology

WDTE
35.6%
QYLD
53.8%

Financial Services

WDTE
11.8%
QYLD
0.2%

Communication Services

WDTE
11.2%
QYLD
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

WDTE
10.1%
QYLD
12.3%

Healthcare

WDTE
8.5%
QYLD
4.2%

Industrials

WDTE
8.3%
QYLD
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

WDTE
4.9%
QYLD
7.7%

Energy

WDTE
3.5%
QYLD
0.6%

Utilities

WDTE
2.4%
QYLD
1.4%

Real Estate

WDTE
1.9%
QYLD
0.1%

Basic Materials

WDTE
1.8%
QYLD
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDTE vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDTE
WDTE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
WDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDTE vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDTEQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.63

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

4.84

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.52

28.36

-12.84

WDTE vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the QYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDTE and QYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDTEQYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.80

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

0.59

+0.74

Drawdowns

WDTE vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDTEQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

-24.75%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-4.97%

-2.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.06%

-0.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.82%

-3.84%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

0.85%

+0.70%

Volatility

WDTE vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison

Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) has a higher volatility of 2.37% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) at 1.85%. This indicates that WDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDTEQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.37%

1.85%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

7.12%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.28%

8.58%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.34%

14.70%

-3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.34%

15.49%

-4.15%

WDTE vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDTE has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDTE vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.86%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.46%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
31.86%35.78%51.80%16.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDTE and QYLD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDTE has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to QYLD (1.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs QYLD's -24.75%.

On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 24.07% vs 23.93% for QYLD. On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLD has been the lower-risk option at 1.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 24.07% return vs 23.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WDTE.

WDTE has the higher dividend yield at 31.86%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

WDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Global X. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WDTE and 0.60% for QYLD.

QYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDTE and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer