PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDTE vs. GLDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDTE vs. GLDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDTE achieves a 9.31% return, which is significantly higher than GLDY's -7.66% return.


WDTE

1D
-0.09%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
9.31%
6M
9.03%
1Y
21.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLDY

1D
-0.54%
1M
-6.13%
YTD
-7.66%
6M
-9.83%
1Y
5.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDTE vs. GLDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WDTE and GLDY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025

0.13

The correlation between WDTE and GLDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDTE vs. GLDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDTE
WDTE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDY
GLDY Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GLDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDTE vs. GLDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) and Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WDTEGLDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.08

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

0.22

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.06

0.83

+12.23

WDTE vs. GLDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the GLDY Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDTE and GLDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDTE vs. GLDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDTE drawdown since its inception was -15.85%, smaller than the maximum GLDY drawdown of -25.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDTE and GLDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDTEGLDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.85%

-25.90%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.65%

-25.90%

+18.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-17.88%

+16.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-4.42%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

6.80%

-5.16%

Volatility

WDTE vs. GLDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (WDTE) is 4.24%, while Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF (GLDY) has a volatility of 14.80%. This indicates that WDTE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDTEGLDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

14.80%

-10.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

23.16%

-13.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.90%

24.59%

-13.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.49%

23.27%

-11.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.49%

23.27%

-11.78%

WDTE vs. GLDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDTE has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDTE vs. GLDY - Dividend Comparison

WDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 32.54%, less than GLDY's 50.87% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GLDY
Defiance Gold Enhanced Options Income ETF
50.87%37.38%0.00%0.00%
WDTE
Defiance S&P 500 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF
32.54%35.78%51.80%16.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDTE and GLDY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLDY has higher volatility (14.80%) compared to WDTE (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDTE dropped -15.85% vs GLDY's -25.90%.

On 1-year performance, WDTE leads with 21.42% vs 5.66% for GLDY. On fees, GLDY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, WDTE has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WDTE has performed better with a 21.42% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLDY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WDTE.

GLDY has the higher dividend yield at 50.87%, compared with 32.54% for WDTE.

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WDTE and 0.99% for GLDY.

WDTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDTE and GLDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer