BHP vs. RIO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BHP Group (BHP) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO).

Performance

BHP vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BHP Group (BHP) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BHP vs. RIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BHP BHP Group	22.86%	28.91%	-24.64%	16.50%	44.34%	0.91%	25.37%	24.50%	10.55%	33.87%
RIO Rio Tinto Group	19.83%	44.47%	-15.36%	11.06%	18.48%	-3.67%	36.22%	33.18%	-2.93%	44.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BHP : $185.09B RIO : $152.85B
EPS BHP : $8.51 RIO : $13.11
PE Ratio BHP : 8.55 RIO : 7.11
PS Ratio BHP : 1.72 RIO : 1.37
PB Ratio BHP : 3.67 RIO : 2.46
Total Revenue (TTM) BHP : $107.64B RIO : $111.41B
Gross Profit (TTM) BHP : $89.04B RIO : $31.10B
EBITDA (TTM) BHP : $52.23B RIO : $40.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHP achieves a 22.86% return, which is significantly higher than RIO's 19.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BHP having a 20.74% annualized return and RIO not far behind at 20.69%.

BHP

• 1D: 5.39%
• 1M: -9.07%
• YTD: 22.86%
• 6M: 33.04%
• 1Y: 56.18%
• 3Y*: 9.75%
• 5Y*: 13.16%
• 10Y*: 20.74%

RIO

• 1D: 5.03%
• 1M: -3.46%
• YTD: 19.83%
• 6M: 45.28%
• 1Y: 63.49%
• 3Y*: 17.83%
• 5Y*: 11.59%
• 10Y*: 20.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BHP vs. RIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHP

BHP Risk / Return Rank: 86
BHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
BHP Omega Ratio Rank: 82
BHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
BHP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

RIO

RIO Risk / Return Rank: 91
RIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
RIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
RIO Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RIO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHP vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BHP Group (BHP) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BHP	RIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	2.27	-0.53
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	2.85	-0.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.38	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	4.01	-1.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.26	13.33	-3.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BHP vs. RIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHP Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the RIO Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHP and RIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BHP	RIO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.74	2.27	-0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	0.40	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.67	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.32	-0.01

Correlation

The correlation between BHP and RIO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

BHP vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

BHP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than RIO's 4.31% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BHP BHP Group	3.66%	3.64%	5.98%	4.98%	22.44%	9.98%	3.67%	8.59%	4.89%	3.61%	1.68%	9.38%
RIO Rio Tinto Group	4.31%	4.66%	7.40%	5.40%	10.48%	10.23%	5.13%	7.68%	6.32%	4.47%	3.93%	7.58%

Drawdowns

BHP vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHP drawdown since its inception was -76.22%, smaller than the maximum RIO drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHP and RIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	BHP	RIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.22%	-88.97%	+12.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.80%	-15.19%	-4.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.21%	-36.97%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.29%	-37.47%	-6.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.65%	-4.84%	-5.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.37%	-23.88%	+2.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.36%	4.57%	+0.79%

Volatility

BHP vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

BHP Group (BHP) has a higher volatility of 12.91% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 11.08%. This indicates that BHP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BHP	RIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.91%	11.08%	+1.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.72%	20.84%	+1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.44%	28.18%	+4.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.93%	29.06%	+2.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.59%	30.93%	+1.66%

Financials

BHP vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BHP Group and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BHP Group reported a gross profit of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.9%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

BHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BHP Group reported an operating income of 11.98B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 8.15B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

BHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BHP Group reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 27.95B, resulting in a net margin of 20.2%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.42B and revenue of 30.65B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.