WDIV vs. SPYM
WDIV (SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WDIV is a Global Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WDIV returned 7.48%/yr vs 15.62%/yr for SPYM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WDIV charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
WDIV vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than SPYM's 10.98% return. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 7.48%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.62% annualized return.
WDIV
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 10.40%
- 1Y
- 21.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.48%
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 10.98%
- 6M
- 10.98%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.91%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
WDIV vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 8.20% | 27.16% | 7.61% | 8.21% | -6.92% | 14.44% | -10.18% | 20.12% | -8.81% | 19.03% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 10.98% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDIV and SPYM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2013 | 0.68 |
The correlation between WDIV and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (3 years) to 0.70 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WDIV vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WDIV
SPYM
Financial Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
WDIV
SPYM
Utilities
WDIV
SPYM
Real Estate
WDIV
SPYM
Industrials
WDIV
SPYM
Communication Services
WDIV
SPYM
Energy
WDIV
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
WDIV
SPYM
Healthcare
WDIV
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
WDIV
SPYM
Basic Materials
WDIV
SPYM
Technology
WDIV
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDIV vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
WDIV
SPYM
WDIV vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WDIV | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.16 | 2.39 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 3.27 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 3.17 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.39 | 14.76 | -5.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WDIV | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 2.39 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.83 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.87 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.62 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
WDIV vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDIV | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.34% | -54.46% | +12.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.61% | -8.90% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.26% | -18.72% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.12% | -24.48% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.34% | -33.87% | -8.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.25% | -0.66% | -0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.85% | -7.15% | +1.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 1.91% | +0.42% |
Volatility
WDIV vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) have volatilities of 2.95% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDIV | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 2.83% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 8.90% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 11.80% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.77% | 16.80% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.40% | 18.00% | -2.60% |
WDIV vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDIV vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, more than SPYM's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
WDIV SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF | 4.04% | 4.27% | 4.63% | 4.73% | 5.12% | 4.15% | 5.55% | 3.99% | 4.42% | 3.62% | 4.32% | 5.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WDIV and SPYM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WDIV has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to SPYM (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.62% vs 7.48% for WDIV. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.62% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for WDIV.
WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 1.00% for SPYM.
WDIV is categorized as Global Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WDIV and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer