PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDIV vs. PID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDIV vs. PID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than PID's 3.12% return. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed PID with an annualized return of 7.81%, while PID has yielded a comparatively higher 8.94% annualized return.


WDIV

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
7.89%
6M
7.85%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
17.68%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
7.81%

PID

1D
0.32%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
3.12%
6M
3.17%
1Y
14.07%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
8.28%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. PID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
7.89%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%20.12%-8.81%19.03%
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.12%24.45%3.08%14.28%-6.48%24.49%-6.56%25.87%-11.46%19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and PID is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2013

0.85

The correlation between WDIV and PID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDIV vs. PID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDIV
PID

Financial Services

19.1%
17.5%

Real Estate

8.2%
0.4%

Utilities

7.5%
15.1%

Energy

7.4%
12.5%

Industrials

6.0%
7.5%

Communication Services

5.1%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
6.2%

Basic Materials

4.5%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
6.2%

Technology

2.4%
9.1%

Healthcare

2.2%
8.6%

Financial Services

WDIV
19.1%
PID
17.5%

Real Estate

WDIV
8.2%
PID
0.4%

Utilities

WDIV
7.5%
PID
15.1%

Energy

WDIV
7.4%
PID
12.5%

Industrials

WDIV
6.0%
PID
7.5%

Communication Services

WDIV
5.1%
PID
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
4.6%
PID
6.2%

Basic Materials

WDIV
4.5%
PID
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
3.9%
PID
6.2%

Technology

WDIV
2.4%
PID
9.1%

Healthcare

WDIV
2.2%
PID
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDIV vs. PID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PID
PID Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PID Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PID Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PID Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PID Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. PID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WDIVPIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.26

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

1.89

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.53

6.22

+2.31

WDIV vs. PID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the PID Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and PID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. PID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum PID drawdown of -66.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and PID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDIVPIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-66.34%

+24.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-7.47%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

-13.34%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-22.97%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

-46.07%

+3.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-4.35%

+2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-13.01%

+7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.34%

2.27%

+0.07%

Volatility

WDIV vs. PID - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PID) at 2.68%. This indicates that WDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDIVPIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

2.68%

+0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

7.86%

+0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.29%

9.83%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

13.96%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.24%

17.67%

-2.43%

WDIV vs. PID - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PID's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDIV vs. PID - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.29%, more than PID's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PID
Invesco International Dividend Achievers™ ETF
3.61%3.28%3.88%3.31%3.30%3.30%3.16%3.99%3.87%3.46%3.90%4.48%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
4.29%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDIV and PID have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDIV has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to PID (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs PID's -66.34%.

On 10-year performance, PID leads with 8.94% vs 7.81% for WDIV. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, PID has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PID has performed better with a 8.94% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PID.

WDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.29%, compared with 3.61% for PID.

WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while PID tracks Nasdaq International Dividend Achievers (NR). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.56% for PID.

WDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and PID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer