PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDIV vs. IDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDIV vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDIV achieves a 8.20% return, which is significantly lower than IDV's 12.32% return. Over the past 10 years, WDIV has underperformed IDV with an annualized return of 7.48%, while IDV has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.


WDIV

1D
-1.21%
1M
1.41%
YTD
8.20%
6M
10.40%
1Y
21.84%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
7.48%

IDV

1D
-1.09%
1M
0.90%
YTD
12.32%
6M
15.21%
1Y
36.98%
3Y*
25.10%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDIV vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
8.20%27.16%7.61%8.21%-6.92%14.44%-10.18%20.12%-8.81%19.03%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
12.32%52.16%4.00%10.32%-6.40%12.00%-5.94%23.56%-10.37%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between WDIV and IDV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2013

0.88

The correlation between WDIV and IDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

WDIV vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WDIV
IDV

Financial Services

23.1%
30.1%

Utilities

13.8%
11.8%

Real Estate

13.3%
2.4%

Industrials

12.1%
6.7%

Communication Services

9.8%
10.0%

Energy

7.1%
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
7.2%

Healthcare

4.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
9.6%

Basic Materials

3.1%
5.8%

Technology

2.9%
0.9%

Financial Services

WDIV
23.1%
IDV
30.1%

Utilities

WDIV
13.8%
IDV
11.8%

Real Estate

WDIV
13.3%
IDV
2.4%

Industrials

WDIV
12.1%
IDV
6.7%

Communication Services

WDIV
9.8%
IDV
10.0%

Energy

WDIV
7.1%
IDV
15.6%

Consumer Defensive

WDIV
6.4%
IDV
7.2%

Healthcare

WDIV
4.6%
IDV

-

Consumer Cyclical

WDIV
3.9%
IDV
9.6%

Basic Materials

WDIV
3.1%
IDV
5.8%

Technology

WDIV
2.9%
IDV
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDIV vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDIV
WDIV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDIV vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDIVIDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.52

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

4.36

-1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.39

16.67

-7.28

WDIV vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the IDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDIV and IDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDIVIDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.90

-0.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.77

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.58

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.22

+0.25

Drawdowns

WDIV vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDIV drawdown since its inception was -42.34%, smaller than the maximum IDV drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDIV and IDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDIVIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.34%

-70.14%

+27.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-8.52%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

-11.86%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.12%

-29.19%

+7.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.34%

-42.50%

+0.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-2.80%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-15.40%

+9.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.22%

+0.11%

Volatility

WDIV vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF (WDIV) is 2.95%, while iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that WDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDIVIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

4.32%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

10.60%

-2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

12.85%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.77%

15.54%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

17.94%

-2.54%

WDIV vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDIV has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDIV vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

WDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than IDV's 4.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
4.45%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%
WDIV
SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
4.04%4.27%4.63%4.73%5.12%4.15%5.55%3.99%4.42%3.62%4.32%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDIV and IDV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDV has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to WDIV (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDIV dropped -42.34% vs IDV's -70.14%.

On 10-year performance, IDV leads with 10.28% vs 7.48% for WDIV. On fees, WDIV is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, WDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDV has performed better with a 10.28% return vs 7.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WDIV is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.45%, compared with 4.04% for WDIV.

WDIV tracks S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index sp_43, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for WDIV and 0.49% for IDV.

IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDIV and IDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer