PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDGF vs. QGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDGF vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than QGRW's 15.43% return.


WDGF

1D
-1.45%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
3.03%
6M
8.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QGRW

1D
-1.04%
1M
9.03%
YTD
15.43%
6M
14.57%
1Y
35.66%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDGF vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
WDGF
WisdomTree Global Defense Fund
3.03%-0.25%
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
15.43%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between WDGF and QGRW is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDGF vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDGF

QGRW
QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDGF vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WDGF vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDGFQGRWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

1.66

-1.48

Drawdowns

WDGF vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum QGRW drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and QGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDGFQGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-24.40%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.77%

-1.33%

-11.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.46%

-3.26%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.94%

Volatility

WDGF vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDGFQGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.41%

17.40%

+5.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.41%

21.08%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

21.08%

+1.33%

WDGF vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

WDGF vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than QGRW's 0.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
QGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund
0.07%0.09%0.14%0.11%
WDGF
WisdomTree Global Defense Fund
0.05%0.05%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDGF and QGRW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WDGF.

QGRW has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.

WDGF is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDGF and 0.28% for QGRW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDGF and QGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer