WDGF vs. SHLD
WDGF (WisdomTree Global Defense Fund) and SHLD (Global X Defense Tech ETF) are both Aerospace & Defense funds - WDGF tracks the WisdomTree Global Defense Index while SHLD tracks the Global X Defense Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. WDGF charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SHLD.
Performance
WDGF vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WDGF achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -0.33% return.
WDGF
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -7.13%
- YTD
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SHLD
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- -13.25%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 6.46%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 40.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $69.07M | $65.06M | $107.90M | |
| $40.54K | $43.57K | $158.15K |
WDGF vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 4.98% | -0.39% |
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | -0.33% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between WDGF and SHLD is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WDGF vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank
WDGF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SHLD
WDGF vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Global Defense Fund (WDGF) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WDGF | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.06 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WDGF vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WDGF drawdown since its inception was -18.00%, smaller than the maximum SHLD drawdown of -25.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDGF and SHLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WDGF | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.00% | -25.40% | +7.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.13% | -17.23% | +6.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -4.17% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.18% | — |
Volatility
WDGF vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WDGF | SHLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.20% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.85% | 25.43% | -2.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 21.57% | +1.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.85% | 21.57% | +1.28% |
WDGF vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WDGF has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SHLD's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
WDGF vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison
WDGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SHLD's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF | 0.66% | 0.55% | 0.53% | 0.26% |
WDGF WisdomTree Global Defense Fund | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, WDGF and SHLD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WDGF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WDGF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHLD.
SHLD has the higher dividend yield at 0.66%, compared with 0.05% for WDGF.
WDGF tracks WisdomTree Global Defense Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WDGF and 0.50% for SHLD.
Find the right allocation for WDGF and SHLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer