PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WDC vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WDC vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Western Digital Corporation (WDC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WDC achieves a 245.04% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, WDC has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 34.20%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.


WDC

1D
5.51%
1M
34.30%
YTD
245.04%
6M
282.33%
1Y
1,009.68%
3Y*
169.70%
5Y*
59.21%
10Y*
34.20%

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WDC vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
245.04%283.68%13.86%65.99%-51.62%17.73%-10.89%77.14%-51.90%19.83%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between WDC and FDL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2006

0.41

The correlation between WDC and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WDC vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WDC
WDC Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
WDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
WDC Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
WDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
WDC Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WDC vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Digital Corporation (WDC) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WDCFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+14.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.05

1.37

+0.68

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

49.55

5.56

+43.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

177.25

13.56

+163.69

WDC vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WDC Sharpe Ratio is 16.12, which is higher than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WDC and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WDCFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.12

2.11

+14.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.23

0.88

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.66

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.45

-0.24

Drawdowns

WDC vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WDC drawdown since its inception was -96.20%, which is greater than FDL's maximum drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WDC and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WDCFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.20%

-65.93%

-30.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.59%

-4.27%

-16.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.65%

-12.24%

-37.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.85%

-16.46%

-44.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.49%

-41.40%

-29.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.18%

+2.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.10%

-9.66%

-42.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.75%

1.75%

+4.00%

Volatility

WDC vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

Western Digital Corporation (WDC) has a higher volatility of 17.18% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that WDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WDCFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.18%

2.85%

+14.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.44%

7.87%

+43.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.33%

11.28%

+52.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.32%

14.31%

+34.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.38%

17.11%

+31.27%

Dividends

WDC vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

WDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
WDC
Western Digital Corporation
0.08%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.81%2.36%5.41%2.51%2.94%3.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


WDC and FDL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WDC has higher volatility (17.18%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WDC dropped -96.20% vs FDL's -65.93%.

WDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (16.12 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WDC and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer