WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L
WCOS.L (SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF) and XLPP.L (Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, from State Street and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, WCOS.L returned 5.58%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for XLPP.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WCOS.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLPP.L.
Performance
WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WCOS.L is traded in USD, while XLPP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLPP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WCOS.L achieves a 3.82% return, which is significantly lower than XLPP.L's 6.20% return. Over the past 10 years, WCOS.L has underperformed XLPP.L with an annualized return of 5.58%, while XLPP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.58% annualized return.
WCOS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -2.38%
- YTD
- 3.82%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 1.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- 3.94%
- 10Y*
- 5.58%
XLPP.L
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- 6.20%
- 6M
- 6.97%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 7.58%
WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WCOS.L SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF | 3.82% | 8.52% | 5.94% | 1.94% | -5.27% | 12.81% | 7.61% | 22.47% | -10.18% | 17.35% |
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 6.20% | 4.45% | 14.06% | -0.70% | -0.46% | 18.72% | 8.70% | 27.88% | -9.57% | 11.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between WCOS.L and XLPP.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2016 | 0.81 |
The correlation between WCOS.L and XLPP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WCOS.L
XLPP.L
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
WCOS.L
XLPP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
WCOS.L
XLPP.L
Healthcare
WCOS.L
XLPP.L
-
Basic Materials
WCOS.L
-
XLPP.L
-
Communication Services
WCOS.L
-
XLPP.L
-
Energy
WCOS.L
-
XLPP.L
-
Financial Services
WCOS.L
-
XLPP.L
-
Industrials
WCOS.L
-
XLPP.L
Real Estate
WCOS.L
-
XLPP.L
-
Technology
WCOS.L
-
XLPP.L
Utilities
WCOS.L
-
XLPP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L — Risk / Return Rank
WCOS.L
XLPP.L
WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) and Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WCOS.L | XLPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.04 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | 0.23 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | 0.48 | -0.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WCOS.L | XLPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 | 0.15 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.50 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.55 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WCOS.L drawdown since its inception was -23.55%, roughly equal to the maximum XLPP.L drawdown of -23.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCOS.L and XLPP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WCOS.L | XLPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.55% | -23.46% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.72% | -9.52% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -12.38% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.62% | -17.12% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.55% | -23.46% | -0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.82% | -8.26% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -4.03% | -0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 4.46% | -0.08% |
Volatility
WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (WCOS.L) is 4.45%, while Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that WCOS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLPP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WCOS.L | XLPP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 5.78% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.04% | 11.43% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 13.93% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.16% | 13.49% | -1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.58% | 13.81% | -1.23% |
WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WCOS.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than XLPP.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
WCOS.L vs. XLPP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WCOS.L nor XLPP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WCOS.L and XLPP.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLPP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLPP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for WCOS.L.
Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for WCOS.L and 0.14% for XLPP.L.
Find the right allocation for WCOS.L and XLPP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer