PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCMSX vs. BINCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCMSX vs. BINCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMSX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCMSX achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than BINCX's 7.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with WCMSX having a 11.23% annualized return and BINCX not far behind at 10.87%.


WCMSX

1D
2.67%
1M
-6.25%
6M
-1.36%
YTD
4.11%
1Y
0.10%
3Y*
10.68%
5Y*
-1.63%
10Y*
11.23%
ALL TIME*
11.41%

BINCX

1D
1.47%
1M
7.58%
6M
3.07%
YTD
7.56%
1Y
13.42%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
18.21%
10Y*
10.87%
ALL TIME*
9.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

WCMSX vs. BINCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WCMSX
WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund
4.11%18.14%4.33%22.26%-42.12%16.65%55.36%45.02%-8.94%42.35%
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
7.56%44.63%22.20%37.99%-9.36%18.22%3.79%6.06%-20.76%10.71%

Correlation

The correlation between WCMSX and BINCX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.70

The correlation between WCMSX and BINCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCMSX vs. BINCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

WCMSX
WCMSX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
WCMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
WCMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BINCX
BINCX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BINCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BINCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

WCMSX vs. BINCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMSX) and Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WCMSXBINCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.19

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.02

1.14

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.05

2.60

-2.54

WCMSX vs. BINCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the BINCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCMSX and BINCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WCMSX vs. BINCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCMSX drawdown since its inception was -51.60%, which is greater than BINCX's maximum drawdown of -48.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCMSX and BINCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCMSXBINCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.60%

-48.15%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.39%

-11.66%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

-11.66%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.60%

-31.97%

-19.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.60%

-48.15%

-3.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.79%

-1.24%

-14.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.71%

-9.38%

-6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

5.10%

-0.22%

Volatility

WCMSX vs. BINCX - Volatility Comparison

WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund (WCMSX) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C (BINCX) at 3.42%. This indicates that WCMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCMSXBINCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

3.42%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.65%

10.80%

+6.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.05%

12.88%

+7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.34%

13.89%

+7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

14.10%

+6.06%

WCMSX vs. BINCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCMSX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BINCX's 1.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCMSX vs. BINCX - Dividend Comparison

WCMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than BINCX's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINCX
Brandes International Small Cap Equity Fund Class C
3.19%3.01%2.54%2.45%2.98%3.85%0.60%0.21%3.77%7.83%3.75%3.04%
WCMSX
WCM International Small Cap Growth Fund
0.78%0.81%1.31%0.00%0.00%10.27%2.73%0.57%4.04%1.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCMSX and BINCX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCMSX has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to BINCX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCMSX dropped -51.60% vs BINCX's -48.15%.

BINCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCMSX and BINCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer