PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WCMI vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WCMI vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust WCM International Equity ETF (WCMI) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WCMI achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 7.61% return.


WCMI

1D
-0.37%
1M
-4.44%
6M
4.77%
YTD
10.62%
1Y
20.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
19.22%

KNG

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.03%
6M
3.22%
YTD
7.61%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
6.61%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WCMI vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WCMI and KNG is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2024

0.36

WCMI vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WCMI
KNG

Technology

22.1%
4.4%

Industrials

17.4%
20.8%

Financial Services

16.5%
13.0%

Healthcare

13.2%
10.8%

Communication Services

8.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
5.4%

Energy

5.7%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
23.4%

Utilities

3.0%
5.6%

Basic Materials

2.7%
9.8%

Real Estate

-

4.2%

Technology

WCMI
22.1%
KNG
4.4%

Industrials

WCMI
17.4%
KNG
20.8%

Financial Services

WCMI
16.5%
KNG
13.0%

Healthcare

WCMI
13.2%
KNG
10.8%

Communication Services

WCMI
8.4%
KNG

-

Consumer Cyclical

WCMI
6.0%
KNG
5.4%

Energy

WCMI
5.7%
KNG
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

WCMI
5.1%
KNG
23.4%

Utilities

WCMI
3.0%
KNG
5.6%

Basic Materials

WCMI
2.7%
KNG
9.8%

Real Estate

WCMI

-

KNG
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WCMI vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WCMI
WCMI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
WCMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCMI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
WCMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCMI Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WCMI vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust WCM International Equity ETF (WCMI) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WCMIKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.17

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

1.24

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

3.10

+3.01

WCMI vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WCMI Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WCMI and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WCMI vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WCMI drawdown since its inception was -12.79%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WCMI and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WCMIKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.79%

-35.12%

+22.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-8.61%

-3.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.49%

-1.80%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-4.10%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.43%

0.00%

Volatility

WCMI vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust WCM International Equity ETF (WCMI) has a higher volatility of 6.02% compared to FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 4.03%. This indicates that WCMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WCMIKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.02%

4.03%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.86%

8.18%

+8.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.67%

10.76%

+8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

13.62%

+4.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.52%

17.13%

+1.39%

WCMI vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

WCMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

WCMI vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

WCMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than KNG's 8.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.29%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%
WCMI
First Trust WCM International Equity ETF
0.56%0.78%15.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WCMI and KNG have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCMI has higher volatility (6.02%) compared to KNG (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WCMI dropped -12.79% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 1-year performance, WCMI leads with 20.87% vs 10.62% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WCMI has performed better with a 20.87% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for WCMI.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.29%, compared with 0.56% for WCMI.

WCMI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for WCMI and 0.75% for KNG.

WCMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WCMI and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer